Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec;12(6):2917-2941.
doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00807-9. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

Biomarkers for the Progression of Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers for the Progression of Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Eleonora M Lad et al. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of severe vision loss worldwide, with a global prevalence that is predicted to substantially increase. Identifying early biomarkers indicative of progression risk will improve our ability to assess which patients are at greatest risk of progressing from intermediate AMD (iAMD) to vision-threatening late-stage AMD. This is key to ensuring individualized management and timely intervention before substantial structural damage. Some structural biomarkers suggestive of AMD progression risk are well established, such as changes seen on color fundus photography and more recently optical coherence tomography (drusen volume, pigmentary abnormalities). Emerging biomarkers identified through multimodal imaging, including reticular pseudodrusen, hyperreflective foci, and drusen sub-phenotypes, are being intensively explored as risk factors for progression towards late-stage disease. Other structural biomarkers merit further research, such as ellipsoid zone reflectivity and choriocapillaris flow features. The measures of visual function that best detect change in iAMD and correlate with risk of progression remain under intense investigation, with tests such as dark adaptometry and cone-specific contrast tests being explored. Evidence on blood and plasma markers is preliminary, but there are indications that changes in levels of C-reactive protein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol may be used to stratify patients and predict risk. With further research, some of these biomarkers may be used to monitor progression. Emerging artificial intelligence methods may help evaluate and validate these biomarkers; however, until we have large and well-curated longitudinal data sets, using artificial intelligence effectively to inform clinical trial design and detect outcomes will remain challenging. This is an exciting area of intense research, and further work is needed to establish the most promising biomarkers for disease progression and their use in clinical care and future trials. Ultimately, a multimodal approach may yield the most accurate means of monitoring and predicting future progression towards vision-threatening, late-stage AMD.

Keywords: Age-related macular degeneration; Biomarkers; Geographic atrophy; Neovascular AMD; iAMD.

Plain language summary

Age-related macular degeneration, or AMD, is an eye disease that causes vision loss. Worldwide, the number of people with AMD is increasing. It is difficult for doctors to know who, among those with AMD, will get worse and lose some of their sight, and who will not. Researchers are trying to find early signs that predict whether AMD will get worse and ways to track AMD progression over time. These signs are known as “biomarkers.” They can be structural (seen in the structures inside the eye), functional (a change in how well someone sees), genetic, or proteins found in the blood. Being able to identify people with AMD that are most at risk of losing their vision will help to make sure they get more frequent review so that interventions can be started quickly before vision is lost permanently. Some structural and functional biomarkers are already well known, while others may be useful and are being intensively researched. Changes in the blood markers need much more research to be useful. Researchers are also looking at how to combine data from different biomarkers. This may be a better way to follow worsening of AMD over time compared to using a single biomarker. In the future, we may also be able to use artificial intelligence to help combine all biomarker data. This is an exciting area of research that will be important to help improve the vision outcomes for people with AMD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Eleonora Lad declares consultancy/scientific advisory boards of Roche, Novartis, Apellis, Allegro, Alexion, Annexon, Aspen Neuroscience, Broadwing Bio, Gemini Therapeutics, Retrotope, Galimedix, IVERIC Bio, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Janssen, Thea Laboratoires, Nanoscope Therapeutics, Perceive Bio, and Osanni Bio, as well as research funding through Duke University from Roche, Novartis, Apellis, Neurotech, Alexion, IVERIC Bio, LumiThera, Gemini Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, and Janssen. Robert Finger declares research funding from Biogen; consultancy/advisory board for Apellis, Alimera, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, ODOS and ProGenerika. Robyn Guymer declares consultancy and/or advisory boards of Roche, Genentech, Apellis, Bayer, Novartis, Belite Bio, Character Bioscience, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ocular Therapeutix.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Biomarkers that may be used to assess the progression of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). AMD age-related macular degeneration, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, cRORA complete RPE and outer retinal atrophy, EZ ellipsoid zone, GA geographic atrophy, iRORA incomplete RPE and outer retinal atrophy, LLVA low-luminance visual acuity, nAMD neovascular AMD, nGA nascent GA, OCT optical coherence tomography, PRO patient-reported outcome

References

    1. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2):e106–e116. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim LS, Mitchell P, Seddon JM, Holz FG, Wong TY. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1728–1738. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60282-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambati J, Atkinson JP, Gelfand BD. Immunology of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(6):438–451. doi: 10.1038/nri3459. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sivaprasad S, Chong NV. The complement system and age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2006;20(8):867–872. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pennington KL, DeAngelis MM. Epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD): associations with cardiovascular disease phenotypes and lipid factors. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016;3:34. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0063-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed