Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit according to T and N stage in small bowel adenocarcinoma: a large retrospective multicenter study
- PMID: 37774004
- PMCID: PMC10582691
- DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad064
Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit according to T and N stage in small bowel adenocarcinoma: a large retrospective multicenter study
Abstract
Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized disease is still debated.
Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included all consecutive patients who underwent curative surgical resection for localized small bowel adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2019 from 3 French cohort studies. Prognostic and predictive factors of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy were analyzed for disease-free survival and overall survival. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was applied in the Cox regression model using the propensity score derived from multivariable logistic regression.
Results: A total of 354 patients were included: median age, 63.5 years; duodenum location, 53.5%; and tumor stage I, II, and III in 31 (8.7%), 144 (40.7%), and 179 (50.6%) patients, respectively. The adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 0 (0%), 66 (48.5%), and 143 (80.3%) patients with stage I, II, and III, respectively (P < .0001). In the subgroup analysis by inverse probability of treatment weighting method, a statistically significant disease-free survival and overall survival benefit in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in high-risk stage II (T4 and/or <8 lymph nodes examined) and III (T4 and/or N2) but not for low-risk stage II (T3 and ≥8 lymph nodes examined) and III (T1-3/N1) tumors (Pinteraction < .05). Furthermore, tumor location in jejunum and ileum was also a statistically significant predictive factor of response to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III tumors (Pinteraction < .05).
Conclusion: In localized small bowel adenocarcinoma, adjuvant chemotherapy seems to provide a statistically significant survival benefit for high-risk stage II and III tumors and for jejunum and ileum tumor locations.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
AZ has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Astellas, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Baxter, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, Zymeworks, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca.
AT has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Merck, Servier, Viatris, Pierre Fabre and Astra Zeneca.
SM has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Servier, BMS.
JLL has participated in consulting board for Servier, received a research support from Sanofi to FFCD.
TW has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for IPSEN, Novartis-AAA, Esteve, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Terumo, Sirtex.
CL has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Astra Zeneca.
OD has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Servier, MSD, BMS.
SP has participated in consulting and/or advisory board for Amgen, Servier, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, MSD, BMS, Astrazeneca.
OB has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Apmonia Therapeutics, Astellas, Deciphera, Merck, Servier, Baxter, MSD, Pierre Fabre.
VH has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Merck, Servier, MSD, Pierre Fabre, AAA, Ipsen, Deciphera.
TL has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Sanofi, Merck Serono, Servier, Amgen, IPSEN, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Astra Zeneca.
DT has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Roche, Servier, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Astra Zeneca, and Bayer.
PA has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Ipsen.
TA has participated in consulting and/or advisory boards for Pierre Fabre, Amgen, SIRTEC, MSD, Servier and BMS.
All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources