How does participatory research work: protocol for a realist synthesis
- PMID: 37775285
- PMCID: PMC10546155
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074075
How does participatory research work: protocol for a realist synthesis
Erratum in
-
Correction: 'how does participatory research work: protocol for a realist synthesis'.BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):e074075corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074075corr1. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38267252 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction: Participatory research science deals with partnerships underlying research, governance and ownership of research products. It is concerned with relationships behind research objectives and methods. Participatory research has gained significant traction in design of health interventions, contextualising these to local settings and stakeholder groups. Despite a massive increase in participatory research exercises, the field remains undertheorised, and the mechanisms for improving health outcomes remain unclear. This realist review seeks to understand how and under what circumstances participatory research impacts health and social outcomes.
Methods and analysis: The review will follow four steps: (1) searching for and selecting evidence, (2) assessing the quality of evidence, (3) extracting and categorising data and (4) synthesising the data in the form of context-mechanism-outcomes configurations. The review will follow the Realist And Meta Narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) II guidelines for reporting realist evaluations. We categorise and synthesise data in four steps: (1) identifying outcomes, (2) identifying contextual components of outcomes, (3) theoretical redescription (abduction) and (4) identifying mechanisms. A retroductive analysis will identify mechanisms by moving between empirical data and theories, using inductive and deductive reasoning to explain the outcomes-context matches. The output will generate middle-range theories on how participatory research works, for whom and under what circumstances.
Ethics and dissemination: This study is a review of a published literature. It does not involve human participants. We will convene a workshop to share and discuss the preliminary results with partners and key stakeholders involved in participatory health research. We will publish the review results in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.
Keywords: PUBLIC HEALTH; Patient Participation; Systematic Review.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Developing a program theory of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and the impacts on the health care system: protocol for a rapid realist review.CMAJ Open. 2020 Aug 31;8(3):E530-E534. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190181. Print 2020 Jul-Sep. CMAJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32873581 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review.Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 20;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-24. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21418604 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Supervision training interventions in the health and human services: realist synthesis protocol.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e025777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025777. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31154303 Free PMC article.
-
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020. PMID: 32450919 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources