Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 30;9(1):79.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00586-3.

Second breast cancer: recurrence score results, clinicopathologic characteristics, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes-exploratory analysis of the Clalit registry

Affiliations

Second breast cancer: recurrence score results, clinicopathologic characteristics, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes-exploratory analysis of the Clalit registry

Shlomit S Shachar et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

Data on using the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) testing on second breast cancer (BC; second primary or local recurrence) are lacking. This cohort study examined patients with first and second BC, who underwent 21-gene testing both times. It included a 'study-cohort' (60 N0/N1mi/N1 ER + HER2‒ BC patients with ≥2 RS results >1 year apart) and a 'general 21-gene-tested BC-cohort' (2044 previously described N0/N1mi/N1 patients). The median time between the first and second BC was 5.2 (IQR, 3.1-7.1) years; the second BC was ipsilateral in 68%. Patient/tumor characteristics of the first- and second-BC in the 'study-cohort' were similar, except for the RS which was higher in the second BC (median [IQR]: 23 [17-30] vs 17 [14-22], p < 0.001). Overall, 56 patients had follow-up data, of whom 5 experienced distant recurrence (2 RS 11-25 patients and 3 RS 26-100 patients). Studies exploring the prognostic utility of the RS in this setting are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared the following competing financial interests and no nonfinancial interests. L.S-G. is employed by and owns stock at Oncotest-Rhenium. A.B-S. is a consultant for Oncotest-Rhenium, S.P-S. reports receiving honoraria from Exact Sciences. All other authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. A Box-and-Whiskers plot showing the RS distribution in the first BC in the study cohort vs the RS distribution in the ‘general 21-tested BC cohort’ by nodal status.
The horizontal line represents the median, and the box is drawn from the 1st to the 3rd quartile. The upper whisker represents the highest value below the 3rd quartile plus 1.5 × IQR. The lower whisker represents the lowest value above the 1st quartile minus 1.5 × IQR. Red x symbols represent datapoints that are beyond the 3rd quartile plus 3 × IQR. BC breast cancer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. RS results in the first and second BC.
a RS results in the second versus the first BC for each patient in the study cohort by nodal status. Red markers/lines represent cases where the second RS was higher than the first, blue markers/lines represent cases where the second RS was lower than the first, and green markers/line represent a case with identical RS results in both tests. b A Box-and-Whiskers plot showing the RS distribution in the first vs the second BC by nodal status. The horizontal line represents the median, and the box is drawn from the 1st to the 3rd quartile. The upper whisker represents the highest value below the 3rd quartile plus 1.5 × IQR. The lower whisker represents the lowest value above the 1st quartile minus 1.5 × IQR. Red circles represent datapoints that are beyond the 3rd quartile plus 3 × IQR. BC breast cancer.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. KM curves of freedom from distant recurrence for the study cohort by RS category in the second RS result.
The box under the graph presents the number of patients at risk at each time point. One-degree of freedom log-rank p values were calculated from all the data. BC breast cancer, CT chemotherapy, RS Recurrence Score.

References

    1. Sparano JA, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:111–121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sparano JA, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;380:2395–2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904819. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gluz O, et al. West German study group phase III PlanB Trial: first prospective outcome data for the 21-gene recurrence score assay and concordance of prognostic markers by central and local pathology assessment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:2341–2349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paik S, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:2817–2826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paik S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:3726–3734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985. - DOI - PubMed