Quality testing of mifepristone and misoprostol in 11 countries
- PMID: 37775986
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15148
Quality testing of mifepristone and misoprostol in 11 countries
Abstract
Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated quality concerns with misoprostol. Mifepristone, however, has not been extensively assessed for quality. Between 2020 and 2021, Concept Foundation and the International Planned Parenthood Federation conducted a study to determine the quality of these medical abortion drugs in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).
Methods: The collection of batch samples of misoprostol and mifepristone was carried out by trained sampling agents in selected LMIC. Single drug packs and combipacks were sampled. A World Health Organization prequalified laboratory conducted testing method verifications and subsequent sample analysis. Tests included identification, assay, related substances, and content uniformity for misoprostol, and identification, assay, related substances, and dissolution for mifepristone.
Results: Samples were collected from Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Uganda and Vietnam. Sixty-four pooled batch samples were tested, consisting of 31 combipacks, 26 misoprostol-only and seven mifepristone-only products. Overall, 54.7% of samples were non-compliant with one or more of the specifications, representing 51.6% of combipack products, 57.1% of misoprostol tablets analyzed and 23.7% of mifepristone tablets. One falsified misoprostol-only product was found.
Conclusion: The present study confirms that a significant problem still exists in relation to the quality of medical abortion drugs in LMIC. For misoprostol, our findings suggest that historical concerns around primary packaging may have been largely resolved but that manufacturing processes for both finished product and active pharmaceutical ingredient need to be improved. The present study also provides evidence of mifepristone quality issues.
Keywords: falsified medicine; medical abortion; medicine quality; mifepristone; misoprostol; pharmaceutical analysis; quality survey; substandard medicine.
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Similar articles
-
A descriptive analysis of medical abortion commodity availability and pricing at retail outlets in 44 countries across four regions globally.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1982460. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1982460. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021. PMID: 34719353 Free PMC article.
-
A descriptive summary of the WHO availability assessments of medical abortion medicines in eight African countries.Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 27;20(Suppl 1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01898-8. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39731093 Free PMC article.
-
A cross-sectional analysis of mifepristone, misoprostol, and combination mifepristone-misoprostol package inserts obtained in 20 countries.Contraception. 2020 May;101(5):315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 32032639
-
Simultaneous compared to interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10+0 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;46(4):270-278. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200448. Epub 2020 Feb 20. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32079651
-
Efficacy of medical abortion prior to 6 gestational weeks: a systematic review.Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 28935220
Cited by
-
Quality of Essential Medicines from Different Sources in Enugu and Anambra, Nigeria.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 May 14;111(1):179-195. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0837. Print 2024 Jul 3. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024. PMID: 38740019 Free PMC article.
-
What do healthcare providers think of the quality of uterotonics? A mixed-methods systematic review.BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 29;13(10):e068442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068442. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37899165 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- World Health Organization. Abortion [WHO website]. Accessed May 31, 2023. https://www.who.int/health‐topics/abortion
-
- World Health Organization. Abortion care guideline. World Health Organization; 2022.
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, 21st List, 2019. World Health Organization; 2019.
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guideline on Self‐Care Interventions for Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. World Health Organization; 2019.
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Self‐Care Interventions: Self‐Management of Medical Abortion, 2022 Update. World Health Organization; 2022.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical