Measurement of psychological inflexibility: an examination of the psychometric properties of the AAQ-3 compared to AAQ-II
- PMID: 37777799
- PMCID: PMC10543298
- DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01318-9
Measurement of psychological inflexibility: an examination of the psychometric properties of the AAQ-3 compared to AAQ-II
Abstract
Due to the limitations of the existing measurements of experiential avoidance, we would like to check the validity of the improved version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), i.e., Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-3 (AAQ-3), in Chinese content. The present study was aim to examine the construct and validity of the Chinese version of AAQ-3 in college students and provide an initial validation of this instrument to promote future cross-cultural examination of the psychological flexibility. Totally 1,572 college students were invited to complete the Chinese AAQ-3 and the related questionnaires at the same time. After one month, 380 participates were assessed with same questionnaires to examine the test-retest reliability. The results indicated a similar one-factor solution in the Chinese AAQ-3 to the original version by exploratory factor analysis, parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good. According to the testing of the measurement invariance, the one-factor model was acceptable across gender (Man = 875, Girl = 697). Additionally, Chinese AAQ-3 was significantly negatively correlated with positive mental health (life satisfaction, mindful attention awareness), significantly positively correlated with negative emotions (depression, anxiety, stress), and significantly positively correlated with AAQ-II and Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ). Besides, Chinese AAQ-3 was the strongest predictor of depression, anxiety, stress and life satisfaction compared to the AAQ-II and BEAQ. However, according to the exploratory structural equation model, the Chinese AAQ-3 demonstrated excellent discriminate validity from negative emotions. Overall, the AAQ-3 modified the limitations of the existing measurements of experiential avoidance (i.e., AAQ-II and BEAQ) as it showed better convergent validity with positive mental health indicators, better discriminant validity with negative emotions, and higher incremental validity. Therefore, the Chinese AAQ-3 is a valid measurement tool for assessing the level of experiential avoidance or psychological flexibility in Chinese college students.
Keywords: College students; Discriminant validity; Experiential avoidance; Measurement equivalence; Psychological inflexibility.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS).Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1051661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36562077 Free PMC article.
-
[Measurement of pain-related experiential avoidance: analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II-Pain in patients with chronic pain].Schmerz. 2021 Dec;35(6):401-411. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00537-6. Epub 2021 Feb 12. Schmerz. 2021. PMID: 33580414 Free PMC article. German.
-
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire-30.BMC Psychol. 2024 May 24;12(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01790-x. BMC Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38790020 Free PMC article.
-
Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives.Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;84:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021. PMID: 33550157
-
How a strong measurement validity review can go astray: A look at and recommendations for future measurement-focused reviews.Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;114:102506. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102506. Clin Psychol Rev. 2024. PMID: 39615954 Review.
References
-
- A-Tjak JGL, Davis ML, Morina N, Powers MB, Smits JAJ, Emmelkamp PMG. A Meta-analysis of the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for clinically relevant Mental and Physical Health problems. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(1):30–6. - PubMed
-
- Fang S, Ding D. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for children. J Context Behav Sci. 2020;15:225–34.
-
- Levin ME, Hildebrandt MJ, Lillis J, Hayes SC. The impact of Treatment Components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: a Meta-analysis of Laboratory-Based component studies. Behav Ther. 2012;43(4):741–56. - PubMed
-
- Hayes SC, Acceptance, Therapy C. Relational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies – republished article. Behav Ther. 2016;47(6):869–85. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical