Unravelling the due importance of pseudogenes and their resurrection in plants
- PMID: 37778114
- DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108062
Unravelling the due importance of pseudogenes and their resurrection in plants
Abstract
The complexities of a genome are underpinned to the vast expanses of the intergenic region, which constitutes ∼97-98% of the genome. This region is essentially composed of what is colloquially referred to as the "junk DNA" and is composed of various elements like transposons, repeats, pseudogenes, etc. The latter have long been considered as dead elements merely contributing to transcriptional noise in the genome. Many studies now describe the previously unknown regulatory functions of these genes. Recent advances in the Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have allowed unprecedented access to these regions. With the availability of whole genome sequences of more than 788 different plant species in past 20 years, genome annotation has become feasible like never before. Different bioinformatic pipelines are available for the identification of pseudogenes. However, still little is known about their biological functions. The functional validation of these genes remains challenging and research in this area is still in infancy, particularly in plants. CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing could provide solutions to understand the biological roles of these genes by allowing creation of precise edits within these genes. The possibility of pseudogene reactivation or resurrection as has been demonstrated in a few studies might open new avenues of genetic manipulation to yield a desirable phenotype. This review aims at comprehensively summarizing the progress made with regards to the identification of pseudogenes and understanding their biological functions in plants.
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas; DNA methylation; Gene regulation; Gene resurrection; Non-coding RNAs; Pseudogenes.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Gauging the trends of pseudogenes in plants.Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021 Nov;41(7):1114-1129. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1901648. Epub 2021 May 17. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 33993808 Review.
-
CRISPR/Cas Technologies Applied to Pseudogenes.Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2324:265-284. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1503-4_17. Methods Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 34165721
-
Pseudogene: lessons from PCR bias, identification and resurrection.Mol Biol Rep. 2011 Aug;38(6):3709-15. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0485-4. Epub 2010 Nov 30. Mol Biol Rep. 2011. PMID: 21116863
-
Systematic functional interrogation of human pseudogenes using CRISPRi.Genome Biol. 2021 Aug 23;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02464-2. Genome Biol. 2021. PMID: 34425866 Free PMC article.
-
[Pseudogenes: structure conservation, expression, and functions].Zh Obshch Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug;65(4):306-21. Zh Obshch Biol. 2004. PMID: 15490577 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Development of a 101.6K liquid-phased probe for GWAS and genomic selection in pine wilt disease-resistance breeding in Masson pine.Plant Genome. 2025 Mar;18(1):e70005. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70005. Plant Genome. 2025. PMID: 40025411 Free PMC article.
-
Intraspecific Differentiation of Styrax japonicus (Styracaceae) as Revealed by Comparative Chloroplast and Evolutionary Analyses.Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 18;15(7):940. doi: 10.3390/genes15070940. Genes (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39062719 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous