Internal Consistency of the Voice Handicap Index in Individuals With Dysphonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 37778959
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.08.012
Internal Consistency of the Voice Handicap Index in Individuals With Dysphonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the internal consistency of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) for evaluating the vocal handicap of individuals with dysphonia.
Methods: This is a systematic review. Studies with a cross-sectional design and including a population of individuals with dysphonia, which validated the VHI and analyzed its internal consistency, were included. The following electronic databases were searched: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed, including Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. A manual search was performed in gray literature through the Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. In addition, the list of references of studies selected in the electronic search was mapped, and an expert in the area was consulted. Two reviewers blindly and independently conducted the selection, data extraction, and analysis of the risk of bias, the certainty of the evidence, and good psychometric measures. A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model using the JAMOVI 2.3.2 software.
Results: Forty-nine studies were analyzed. In risk of bias assessment, the studies were classified as having inadequate structural validity and very good internal consistency. The analysis of good psychometric properties indicated indeterminate structural validity and insufficient internal consistency. The overall value of Cronbach's alpha was estimated at 0.94, thus suggesting a very good internal consistency. However, there was high heterogeneity. The level of certainty of the evidence was too low for internal consistency.
Conclusion: The VHI proved to be a consistent and reliable patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate voice handicap in individuals with dysphonia; however, studies are heterogeneous, and the certainty of evidence is very low.
Keywords: Internal consistency; Reliability; Systematic review; VHI; Voice Handicap Index; Voice disorder.
Copyright © 2023 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Reliability, Measurement Error, and Responsiveness of the Voice Handicap Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Voice. 2024 Jul 18:S0892-1997(24)00169-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.05.017. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2024. PMID: 39030149 Review.
-
Crosscultural Adaption and Validation of the Danish Voice Handicap Index-10.J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):661.e7-661.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 3. J Voice. 2021. PMID: 31911021
-
Psychometric Properties of the Voice Handicap Index-10 in Kannada.J Voice. 2023 Oct 7:S0892-1997(23)00290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.09.013. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2023. PMID: 37806903
-
[Linguistic adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index (VHI)-30 in patients with dysphonia into Russian].Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2021;86(3):20-27. doi: 10.17116/otorino20218603120. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2021. PMID: 34269019 Russian.
-
Prevalence of Dysphonia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Voice. 2024 Dec 24:S0892-1997(24)00386-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.003. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2024. PMID: 39721880 Review.
Cited by
-
Summary of the best evidence for vocal rehabilitation training in adults with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Nov 13;86(12):7270-7277. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002722. eCollection 2024 Dec. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39649893 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources