Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 12;39(4):649-667.
doi: 10.1007/s43188-023-00192-2. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Acute toxicity assessment of nine organic UV filters using a set of biotests

Affiliations

Acute toxicity assessment of nine organic UV filters using a set of biotests

Stec Marcin et al. Toxicol Res. .

Abstract

UV filters in environmental compartments are a source of concern related to their ecotoxicological effects. However, little is known about UV filters' toxicity, particularly those released into the environment as mixtures. Acute toxicity of nine organic UV filters benzophenone-1, benzophenone-2, benzophenone-3, 4-methoxy benzylidene camphor, octocrylene, ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, homosalate, and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane was determined. UV filter solutions were tested as single, binary, and ternary mixtures of various compositions. Single solutions were tested using a set of bio tests, including tests on saline crustaceans (Artemia franciscana), freshwater crustaceans (Daphnia magna), marine bacteria (Aliivibrio fischeri), and freshwater plants (Lemna minor). The tests represent different stages of the trophic chain, and hence their overall results could be used to risk assessment concerning various water reservoirs. The toxicity of binary and ternary mixtures was analyzed using the standardized Microtox® method. Generally, organic UV filters were classified as acutely toxic. Octocrylene was the most toxic for Arthemia franciscana (LC50 = 0.55 mg L-1) and Daphnia magna (EC50 = 2.66-3.67 mg L-1). The most toxic against freshwater plants were homosalate (IC50 = 1.46 mg L-1) and octocrylene (IC50 = 1.95 mg L-1). Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EC50 = 1.38-2.16 mg L-1) was the most toxic for marine bacteria. The least toxic for crustaceans and plants were benzophenone-1 (EC50 = 6.15-46.78 mg L-1) and benzophenone-2 (EC50 = 14.15-54.30 mg L-1), while 4-methoxy benzylidene camphor was the least toxic for marine bacteria (EC50 = 12.97-15.44 mg L-1). Individual species differ in their sensitivity to the tested organic UV filters. An assessment of the toxicity of mixtures indicates high and acute toxicity to marine bacteria after exposition to a binary mixture of benzophenone-2 with octocrylene, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, or homosalate. The toxicity of mixtures was lower than single solutions predicting antagonistic interaction between chemicals.

Keywords: Acute toxicity; Biotest set; Environmental risk assessment; The toxicity of binary and ternary mixtures; UV filters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bioluminescence inhibition for single UV filters in the Microtox® screening test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimated EC50 values obtained for single UV filters in the Microtox® basic test
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Estimated EC50 and LC50 values in the Artoxkit M™ test
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Estimated EC50 values in the Daphtoxkit F™ test
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Visible defects Lemna minor after exposition to UV filters in comparison to control
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Estimated IC50 values in the Lemna sp. GIT test after 7 days exposition

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Statista Search Department (2022) Market revenue of the sun protection market worldwide from 2013 to 2026 [Infographic]. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/812522/sun-care-market-value-global#s...
    1. Giokas DL, Salvador A, Chisvert A. UV filters: from sunscreens to human body and the environment. TrAC. 2007;26:360–374. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2007.02.012. - DOI
    1. Sánchez-Quiles D, Tovar-Sánchez A. Are sunscreens a new environmental risk associated with coastal tourism? Environ Int. 2015;83:158–170. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Labille J, Slomberg D, Catalano R, Robert S, Apres-Termelo ML, Boudenne JL, Manasfi T, Radakovitch O. Assessing UV filter inputs into beach waters during recreational activity: a field study of three French Mediterranean beaches from consumer survey to water analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2020;706:136010. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C, Giovannelli D, Damiani E, Astolfi P, Greci L, Pusceddu A. Sunscreens cause coral bleaching by promoting viral infections. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:441–447. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10966. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources