Healthcare professionals' and patients' assessments of listed mobile health apps in China: a qualitative study
- PMID: 37780445
- PMCID: PMC10538635
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1220160
Healthcare professionals' and patients' assessments of listed mobile health apps in China: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: In recent years, mobile health (mHealth) has gradually developed in China, and intelligent medicine has become an important research topic. However, there are still significant problems in mHealth applications (apps). Although healthcare professionals and patients are the main users, few studies have focused on their perceptions of the quality of mHealth apps.
Objective: This study aimed to (1) understand the respective perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients regarding mHealth apps, (2) assess what barriers exist that influence the user experience, and (3) explore how to improve the quality of mHealth apps and the development of the mHealth market in China. The study aims to promote the standardization of mHealth apps and provide effective information for the improvement and development of mHealth apps in the future.
Methods: Semistructured interviews with 9 patients and 14 healthcare professionals were conducted from January 2022 to April 2022 in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. The participants used mHealth apps for more than 3 months, including the "Good Mood" and "Peace and Safe Doctors" apps and apps developed by the hospital that were popular in China. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: The following five themes were extracted: different concerns, hidden medical dangers, distance and insecurity, barriers for older people, and having positive perceptions of mHealth apps. Healthcare professionals prioritized simplicity in regard to mHealth apps, whereas patients rated effectiveness as the most crucial factor. The study also revealed several problems with mHealth apps, including insufficient information about physician qualifications, inaccurate medical content, nonstandard treatment processes, and unclear accountability, which led to a sense of distance and insecurity among participants. Older individuals faced additional obstacles when using mHealth apps. Despite these issues, the participants remained optimistic about the future of mHealth app development.
Conclusion: The utilization, advantages, and obstacles of mHealth applications for healthcare professionals and patients were explored through semistructured interviews. Despite the promising prospects for mHealth apps in China, numerous issues still need to be addressed. Enhancing the safety monitoring system and developing user-friendly mHealth apps for older adult patients are essential steps to bridge the gap between healthcare providers and patients.
Keywords: healthcare professionals; mobile health; patients; qualitative; quality.
Copyright © 2023 Liu, Li and Zhang.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients with cardiovascular diseases on mHealth lifestyle apps: A qualitative study.Int J Med Inform. 2025 Feb;194:105706. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105706. Epub 2024 Nov 19. Int J Med Inform. 2025. PMID: 39581013
-
Insights Into How mHealth Applications Could Be Introduced Into Standard Hypertension Care in Germany: Qualitative Study With German Cardiologists and General Practitioners.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Mar 28;13:e56666. doi: 10.2196/56666. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025. PMID: 40153776 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives and Needs of Malaysian Patients With Diabetes for a Mobile Health App Support on Self-Management of Diabetes: Qualitative Study.JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Oct 23;8:e40968. doi: 10.2196/40968. JMIR Diabetes. 2023. PMID: 37870903 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Perceptions of mHealth Apps: Meta-Ethnographic Review of Qualitative Studies.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 10;7(7):e13817. doi: 10.2196/13817. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31293246 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and Evaluation of Methodologies to Assess the Quality of Mobile Health Apps in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 12;9(10):e28384. doi: 10.2196/28384. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34636737 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Experience of Older Patients with COPD Using Disease Management Apps: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;12(7):802. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070802. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38610224 Free PMC article.
-
Insights into the Technological Evolution and Research Trends of Mobile Health: Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(7):740. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070740. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218038 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors that influence the preferences for telehealth among family caregivers of disabled elders: a qualitative study.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 21;8:100351. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100351. eCollection 2025 Jun. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025. PMID: 40510461 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery concept process optimization on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03626-1. BMC Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40087739 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Participation in Medication Safety for Noncommunicable Diseases: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners, Pharmacists, and Outpatients' Perspectives in Beijing.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Sep 14;18:1907-1918. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S474921. eCollection 2024. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024. PMID: 39296427 Free PMC article.
References
-
- iiMedia . (2017). IiMedia group. Available at: www.iimedia.cn/c400/49397.html.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous