Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 12;9(3):257-261.
doi: 10.1002/wjo2.107. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Cost and value of office-based facial plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures

Affiliations
Review

Cost and value of office-based facial plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures

Alexandra O Hamberis et al. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: This chapter will provide an overview of factors affecting the cost of office-based procedures in Facial Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery (FPRS), and will discuss the value of office-based interventions.

Material and methods: An in-depth literature review was conducted using multiple primary and secondary sources. Literature from multiple disciplines was included in the review, including otolaryngology, anesthesiology, surgery, public health, and economics.

Discussion/conclusions: A wide variety of procedures can be performed in an FPRS office. Large upfront costs to the office include laser, electrocautery and surgical equipment. These investments will yield an initial negative cost margin until sufficient case volume is achieved. It is often in the best interest of the patient to perform a procedure in-office and avoid the facility and anesthesia fees associated with a surgical center or hospital. Costs and reimbursements vary greatly across regions and facilities. Additionally, overall cost depends on payer mix, procedures performed, and productivity of the practice. The scarcity of literature on this topic as it applies specifically to FPRS indicates that further research is needed to elucidate the value of common facial plastics procedures in an office-based setting.

Keywords: facial plastic surgery; office‐based procedures; reconstructive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Gupta N, Haglin JM, Marostica CW, Thornburg DA, Casey WJ 3rd. Trends in Medicare reimbursement for reconstructive plastic surgery procedures: 2000 to 2019. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2020;146:1541‐1551. - PubMed
    1. Dominguez JL, Ederaine SA, Haglin JM, Aragon Sierra AM, Barrs DM, Lott DG. Medicare reimbursement trends for facility performed otolaryngology procedures: 2000‐2019. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:496‐501. - PubMed
    1. Jones JP, Ellis E 3rd. Are office‐based oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures profitable? A benefit‐cost analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:2205‐2214. - PubMed
    1. Van Sickels JE, Tiner BD. Cost of a genioplasty under deep intravenous sedation in a private office versus general anesthesia in an outpatient surgical center. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:687‐690. - PubMed
    1. Pacella SJ, Comstock MC, Kuzon WM Jr. Facility cost analysis in outpatient plastic surgery: implications for the academic health center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1479‐1488. - PubMed