Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 12:10:1219614.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1219614. eCollection 2023.

High tibial lateral closing wedge and opening wedge valgus osteotomy produce different effects on posterior tibial slope and patellar height

Affiliations

High tibial lateral closing wedge and opening wedge valgus osteotomy produce different effects on posterior tibial slope and patellar height

Songjie Ji et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of performing a closed tibial high osteotomy with an open osteotomy and the changes in posterior tibia slope and patellar height.

Methods: Methods were collected from three hundred and forty patients (440 knees) with high tibial osteotomy performed from January 2019 to January 2020. Forty patients (50 knees) had a lateral closed wedge tibial osteotomy (LCWHTO), and 300 patients (390 knees) had a medial open wedge tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). The follow-up periods were 20.5 months and 19.9 months, respectively. At the final follow-up visit, both groups evaluated the Lysholm score and joint range of motion (ROM). Changes in preoperative and postoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD), proximal medial tibial angle (MPTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and M-K index were compared between the two groups of patients.

Results: Lysholm scores were 79.6 ± 15.6 preoperatively and 96.0 ± 5.0 postoperatively in the LCWHTO group (p < 0.01); 83.7 ± 16.0 preoperatively and 94.3 ± 9.1 postoperatively in the MOWHTO group (p < 0.01). ROM was 136.0° ± 8.4° preoperatively and 133.2° ± 10.1° postoperatively in the LCWHTO group (p > 0.05); 136.5° ± 8.4° preoperatively and 135.7° ± 9.3° postoperatively in the MOWHTO group (p > 0.05). the MAD was (26.5 ± 4.1) mm preoperatively and 0.3 ± 2.9 mm postoperatively in the LCWHTO group (p < 0.01); 21.8 ± 6.5 mm preoperatively and -0.3 ± 2.6 mm postoperatively in the MOWHTO group (p < 0.01). The MPTA in the LCWHTO group was 75.3° ± 3.2° preoperatively and 89.5° ± 2.4° postoperatively (p < 0.01). 77.1° ± 3.0° preoperatively and 90.6° ± 2.7° postoperatively in the MOWHTO group (p < 0.01). M-K index was 0.78 ± 0.08 preoperatively and 0.79 ± 0.07 postoperatively in the LCWHTO group (p > 0.05). 0.78 ± 0.05 before and 0.75 ± 0.05 after surgery in the MOWHTO. 10.8° ± 3.0° PTS before and 8.1° ± 3.4° after surgery in the LCWHTO group (p < 0.05); 10.2° ± 3.1° preoperatively and 10.9° ± 4.0° postoperatively (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: LCWHTO decreases the PTS and has no effect on patellar height; MOWHTO does not affect the PTS but decreases patellar height. The patient should individualize the choice of the osteotomy.

Keywords: closed; high tibial osteotomy (HTO); open; patellar height (PH); posterior tibial slope (PTS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative and post-operative lower limb full-length, AP, and lateral films of the knee. MPTA: medial angle between the tangent line of the tibial plateau and the tibial mechanical axis in the coronal plane; MAD: distance from the center of the knee to the mechanical axis of the lower limb; PTS: angle between the vertical line of the tibial mechanical axis and the tangent line of the tibial plateau in the sagittal plane; M-K index: ratio of the distance from the lower edge of the patella to the tangent line of the femoral condyle to the length of the medial surface of the patella (a/b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jeong SH, Samuel LT, Acuña AJ, Kamath AF. Patient-specific high tibial osteotomy for varus malalignment: 3D-printed plating technique and review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. (2022) 32(5):845–55. 10.1007/s00590-021-03043-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Marinozzi A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Simultaneous arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes and high tibial osteotomy for tibial chondral defects in the varus knee. Knee. (2008) 15(4):309–13. 10.1016/j.knee.2008.04.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu X, Chen Z, Gao Y, Zhang J, Jin Z. High tibial osteotomy: review of techniques and biomechanics. J Healthc Eng. (2019) 2019:8363128. 10.1155/2019/8363128 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray R, Winkler PW, Shaikh HS, Musahl V. High tibial osteotomy for varus deformity of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. (2021) 5(7):e21.00141. 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ducat A, Sariali E, Lebel B, Mertl P, Hernigou P, Flecher X, et al. Posterior tibial slope changes after opening- and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2012) 98(1):68–74. 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources