Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;32(3):1371-1382.
doi: 10.3233/THC-230332.

Ultrasound-based horizontal ranging in the localization of fetal conus medullaris

Affiliations

Ultrasound-based horizontal ranging in the localization of fetal conus medullaris

Xiuping Liu et al. Technol Health Care. 2024.

Expression of concern in

  • Expression of concern.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Technol Health Care. 2025 Nov 12:9287329251392360. doi: 10.1177/09287329251392360. Online ahead of print. Technol Health Care. 2025. PMID: 41223024 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Currently, there are a variety of methods for ultrasound to localize the conus medullaris. A concern is that measured values can be influenced by variations in spinal flexion and extension.

Objective: To overcome this limitation, the present study measures the horizontal distance (HD) between the end of the conus medullaris and the caudal edge of last vertebral body ossification in normal fetus at different gestational weeks, and analyzes the relationship between the measured value and fetal growth, as well as the utility of these measurements in assessing the position of the conus medullaris.

Methods: A total of 655 fetuses at gestational weeks 18-40, who underwent routine prenatal ultrasound, were selected in the study. We measured the distance between the end of the cone of the fetal spinal cord and the caudal end of the final vertebral ossification center (Distance1, D1), the distance between the end of the spinal cord cone and the intersection of the extension of D1 with the caudal skin (Distance2, D2), and HD. We analyzed the correlation between the measurements and gestational weeks, established normal reference values, the ratio of D1, D2 and HD to the commonly used growth parameters was calculated. The ratios of D1, D2, HD and the application value of each ratio phase were analyzed, and the reliability analysis of repeated measurement results among physicians was performed.

Results: D1, D2 and HD exhibited strong linear correlations with gestational weeks. Among the ratios of D1, D2 and HD to common growth parameters, D2/FL stabilized after 20 weeks of gestation and consistently exceeded 1. Repeatability tests between D1, D2 and HD showed good reliability (P> 0.05).

Conclusion: D1, D2 and HD are significantly correlated with gestational age. Horizontal distance measurement can effectively determine the position of fetal conus medullaris, enabling rapid prenatal evaluation of low position of conus medullaris and excluding the possibility of tethered cord.

Keywords: Fetus; conus medullaris; tethered spinal cord; ultrasonic examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any personal, financial, commercial, or academic conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Measurement of D1, D2 and HD ultrasound schematic diagram. The distance between A and B is D1. The distance between A and C is D2. The distance between a and b is HD. Point A (also marked as “a”) stands for the end of the fetal conus medullaris, point B stands for the caudal end of the ossification center of the terminal vertebral body, point C is the intersection of the D1 extension and the caudal skin, point b is the intersection of the horizontal line passing through point A (or a) and the vertical line passing through point B.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlation between D1 and gestational age and reference range.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Correlation between D2 and gestational age and reference range.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Correlation between HD and gestational age and reference range.

References

    1. Rodríguez MA, Prats P, Rodríguez I, Comas C. Prenatal evaluation of the fetal conus medullaris on a routine scan. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 39(2): 113-6. doi: 10.1159/000441295. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dale K, Martí E. Introduction to the special section: Spinal Cord a model to understand CNS development and regeneration. Dev Biol. 2017. Dec 1; 432(1): 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hertzler DA 2nd, DePowell JJ, Stevenson CB, Mangano FT. Tethered cord syndrome: A review of the literature from embryology to adult presentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2010. Jul; 29(1): E1. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1079. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jing B, Zhang H, Sun Y. Prenatal assessment and pregnancy outcomes of foetal low-lying conus medullaris using 3D ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. Dec 23; 22(1): 961. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05244-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paladini D, Malinger G, Birnbaum R, Monteagudo A, Pilu G, Salomon LJ, Timor-Tritsch IE. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 2: Performance of targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. Apr; 57(4): 661-671. doi: 10.1002/uog.23616. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources