Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Nov:138:104728.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104728. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

Subjective versus objective, polymer bur-based selective carious tissue removal: 2-year randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Subjective versus objective, polymer bur-based selective carious tissue removal: 2-year randomized clinical trial

Falk Schwendicke et al. J Dent. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to compare subjective (S) selective carious tissue removal using hand instruments versus objective (O) removal using a self-limiting polymer bur in a single-blind cluster-randomized controlled superiority trial.

Methods: 115 children (aged 7-8 years) with ≥1 vital primary molar with a deep dentin lesion (>1/2 dentin depth) were included and randomized (60 S/55 O); all eligible molars in a child were treated identically (91 S/86 O). Cavities were prepared and carious tissue on pulpal walls selectively removed using hand instruments (S) or a self-limiting polymer bur (Polybur P1, Komet), followed by restoration using a glass hybrid material (Equia Forte, GC). Treatment time and satisfaction data have been reported in a 1-year-interim report. We here report on 2 year survival (tooth retained with or without further retreatments being needed, or tooth exfoliated), analyzed using multi-level Cox-regression analysis, as well as success (ART criteria 0/1, no pulpal complications, no re-intervention needed, or tooth extraction).

Results: 71 restorations in S and 65 in O were examined after a mean (SD, range) of 22 (11; 3-31) months, of which 50 S and 48 O restorations were successful and 70 S and 65 O survived. The majority of failures were restorative, not pulpal, and distribution of ART codes was not significant different between groups. Risk of failure was not significantly associated with the removal protocol (HR; 95 % CI: 0.95; 0.51-1.78), and also not age, sex or dental arch, while single surfaced restorations showed significantly lower hazard (0.14; 0.06-0.37).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in success or survival between objective and subjective carious tissue removal.

Clinical significance: In primary teeth, subjective selective excavation had no disadvantage compared with objective excavation, which required a separate instrument (polymer-based bur) for carious tissue removal. Polymer-based burs may be particularly useful when standardized excavation is needed.

Keywords: Clinical study; Evidence-based dentistry; Excavation; Paediatric dentistry; Restorative dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest This study was supported by a donation of the manufacturer of the Polybur P1, Komet Dental. The planning and conduct of the study was independent of Komet. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 and by the Brazilian Federal District Research Support Foundation (FAPDF, grant number 0193.001463/2016).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources