Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement
- PMID: 37788942
- PMCID: PMC10681700
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.3029
Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement
Abstract
Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspectives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of reporting guidelines, none focuses specifically on the needs of PC. The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Checklist guides reporting of PC research to include the information needed by the diverse PC community, including practitioners, patients, and communities. CRISP complements current guidelines to enhance the reporting, dissemination, and application of PC research findings and results. Prior CRISP studies documented opportunities to improve research reporting in this field. Our surveys of the international, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional PC community identified essential items to include in PC research reports. A 2-round Delphi study identified a consensus list of items considered necessary. The CRISP Checklist contains 24 items that describe the research team, patients, study participants, health conditions, clinical encounters, care teams, interventions, study measures, settings of care, and implementation of findings/results in PC. Not every item applies to every study design or topic. The CRISP guidelines inform the design and reporting of (1) studies done by PC researchers, (2) studies done by other investigators in PC populations and settings, and (3) studies intended for application in PC practice. Improved reporting of the context of the clinical services and the process of research is critical to interpreting study findings/results and applying them to diverse populations and varied settings in PC.Annals "Online First" article.
Keywords: Delphi studies; article; authors; checklist; consensus; editors; guidelines; journals; primary care; publishing; research; research design; research impact; research report; reviewers; stakeholder participation; surveys and questionnaires.
© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary on the CRISP Statement.Ann Fam Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;21(6):482. doi: 10.1370/afm.3066. Ann Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 38012034 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bilbro NA, Hirst A, Paez A, et al. ; IDEAL Collaboration Reporting Guidelines Working Group . The IDEAL reporting guidelines: a Delphi consensus statement stage specific recommendations for reporting the evaluation of surgical innovation. Ann Surg. 2021; 273(1): 82-85. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004180 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Higginson IJ, Evans CJ, Grande G, et al. ; MORECare . Evaluating complex interventions in end-of-life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med. 2013; 24; 11: 111. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources