Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;17(6):1359-1367.
doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10575-0. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

Clinical long-term outcome of hepatitis D compared to hepatitis B monoinfection

Affiliations

Clinical long-term outcome of hepatitis D compared to hepatitis B monoinfection

Anika Wranke et al. Hepatol Int. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Background and aims: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection causes the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis. However, it is still unclear to what extent the underlying cirrhosis may contribute to disease progression. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of HDV infection with HBV monoinfection in a single-center cohort of both non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients.

Method: We retrospectively studied 175 patients with chronic hepatitis D (CHD) who were followed for at least 6 months (median of 6.3 (0.6-23.6) years). In addition, we selected 175 patients with HBV monoinfection (CHB) who were matched for gender, age, region of origin, HBeAg status, and bilirubin. Liver-related clinical end points were defined as hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), liver transplantation, HCC, or liver-related death.

Results: Clinical complications developed earlier (4.6 vs. 6.2 years) and more frequently (35.4% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.01) in CHD patients. In a multivariate Cox regression, HDV infection was independently associated with the development of end points (p < 0.01; HR: 3.0; 95% CI 1.4-6.4). However, in cirrhotic patients there were no significant differences between HBV and HDV in the development of end points. Besides, CHB patients with cirrhosis developed more frequently HCC (35.5%) than CHD patients with cirrhosis (18.5%).

Conclusion: Our results confirmed that HDV leads to a faster progression to cirrhosis compared to HBV. However, once cirrhosis is present, not HDV but the underlying cirrhosis is the dominate intrinsic risk factor for the development of liver-related end points and for the progression to HCC.

Keywords: Cirrhosis; Clinical longterm outcome; HBeAg; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis delta; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver decompensation; Nucleos(t)ide analogs; Pegylated interferon alpha; Therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anika Wranke, Benjamin Heidrich, Katharina Luise Hupa-Breier, Janina Kirschner, and Birgit Bremer declare that they have no conflict of interest. Heiner Wedemeyer serves as clinical trials principal investigator for Abbvie, Altimmune, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, MYR GmbH, Novartis, and Vir Biotechnology, has research grants from Abbvie, Biotest, Gilead, Merck/MSD, and Roche, and advises or is on the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Aligos, Altimmune, Biotest, BMS, BTG, Dicerna, Enanta, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, MYR GmbH, Roche, and Vir Biotechnology. Markus Cornberg received honoraria for lectures or consulting from AbbVie, AiCuris, Falk, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Roche, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (SOBI). Katja Deterding received lecture fees and is on the advisory board for Gilead.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative event-free survival in the group of CHD patients, compared with CHB patients. Risk-free survival for overall end points (a), decompensation (b), HCC (c), death and/or LTX (d)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative event-free survival of CHD with cirrhosis compared with CHB patients with cirrhosis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative event-free survival of CHD with different treatment (IFN, NA, no therapy) compared with CHB patients with different treatment (IFN, NA, no therapy). Risk-free survival for non-cirrhotic (a) and cirrhotic patients (b). Log rank was described for significant analysis only

References

    1. Urban S, Neumann-Haefelin C, Lampertico P. Hepatitis D virus in 2021: virology, immunology and new treatment approaches for a difficult-to-treat disease. Gut. 2021;70:1782–1794. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323888. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polaris Observatory Collaborators Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:383–403. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30056-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stockdale AJ, Kreuels B, Henrion MYR, Giorgi E, Kyomuhangi I, de Martel C, et al. The global prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2020;73:523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niro GA, Smedile A, Ippolito AM, Ciancio A, Fontana R, Olivero A, et al. Outcome of chronic delta hepatitis in Italy: a long-term cohort study. J Hepatol. 2010;53:834–840. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buti M, Homs M, Rodriguez-Frias F, Funalleras G, Jardi R, Sauleda S, et al. Clinical outcome of acute and chronic hepatitis delta over time: a long-term follow-up study. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18:434–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01324.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms