Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 3;7(1):36.
doi: 10.1186/s41927-023-00359-2.

The student patient alliance: development and formative evaluation of an initiative to support collaborations between patient and public involvement partners and doctoral students

Affiliations

The student patient alliance: development and formative evaluation of an initiative to support collaborations between patient and public involvement partners and doctoral students

Gwenda Simons et al. BMC Rheumatol. .

Abstract

Background: While the integration of patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research is now widespread and recommended as standard practice, meaningful PPI in pre-clinical, discovery science research is more difficult to achieve. One potential way to address this is by integrating PPI into the training programmes of discovery science postgraduate doctoral students. This paper describes the development and formative evaluation of the Student Patient Alliance (SPA), a programme developed at the University of Birmingham that connects PPI partners with doctoral students.

Methods: Following a successful pilot of the SPA by the Rheumatology Research Group at the University of Birmingham, the scheme was implemented across several collaborating Versus Arthritis / Medical Research Council (MRC) centres of excellence. Doctoral students were partnered with PPI partners, provided with initial information and guidance, and then encouraged to work together on research and public engagement activities. After six months, students, their PPI partners and the PPI coordinators at each centre completed brief surveys about their participation in the SPA.

Results: Both doctoral students and their PPI partners felt that taking part in SPA had a positive impact on understanding, motivation and communication skills. Students reported an increased understanding of PPI and patient priorities and reported improved public engagement skills. Their PPI partners reported a positive impact of the collaboration with the students. They enjoyed learning about the student's research and contributing to the student's personal development. PPI coordinators also highlighted the benefits of the SPA, but noted some challenges they had experienced, such as difficulties matching students with PPI partners.

Conclusions: The SPA was valued by students and PPI partners, and it is likely that initiatives of this kind would enhance students' PPI and public engagement skills and awareness of patients' experiences on a wider scale. However, appropriate resources are needed at an institutional level to support the implementation of effective programmes of this kind on a larger scale.

Keywords: Discovery science; Doctoral students; Patient and public involvement; Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. National Institute for Health Research Briefing Note Eight: Ways That People Can Be Involved in The Research Cycle. 2017 [Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20170605035051/http://www.invo.org.uk/posttyp....
    1. Maccarthy J, Guerin S, Wilson AG, Dorris ER. Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216600. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoddinott P, Pollock A, O’Cathain A, Boyer I, Taylor J, MacDonald C, et al. How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Res. 2018;7:752. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15162.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans J, Papoulias S. Between funder requirements and ‘jobbing scientists’: the evolution of patient and public involvement in a mental health biomedical research centre - a qualitative study. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00185-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Wit M, Adebajo A. Unique role of rheumatology in establishing collaborative relationships in research. Past, present and future of patient engagement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(3):293. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214387. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources