Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 3;16(1):343.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05942-7.

First field and laboratory evaluation of LAMP assay for malaria diagnosis in Cubal, Angola

Affiliations

First field and laboratory evaluation of LAMP assay for malaria diagnosis in Cubal, Angola

Begoña Febrer-Sendra et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

Background: Malaria is a globally distributed infectious disease. According to the World Health Organization, Angola is one of the six countries that account for over half the global malaria burden in terms of both malaria cases and deaths. Diagnosis of malaria still depends on microscopic examination of thin and thick blood smears and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), which often lack analytical and clinical sensitivity. Molecular methods could overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study was to evaluate, for the first time to our knowledge, the performance of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for the diagnosis of malaria in an endemic area in Cubal, Angola, and to assess the reproducibility at a reference laboratory.

Methods: A total of 200 blood samples from patients attended at Hospital Nossa Senhora da Paz, Cubal, Angola, were analysed for Plasmodium spp. detection by microscopy, RDTs, and LAMP. LAMP assay was easily performed in a portable heating block, and the results were visualized by a simple colour change. Subsequently, the samples were sent to a reference laboratory in Spain to be reanalysed by the same colorimetric LAMP assay and also in real-time LAMP format.

Results: In field tests, a total of 67/200 (33.5%) blood samples were microscopy-positive for Plasmodium spp., 98/200 RDT positive, and 112/200 (56%) LAMP positive. Using microscopy as reference standard, field LAMP detected more microscopy-positive samples than RDTs (66/67; 98% vs. 62/67; 92.5%). When samples were reanalysed at a reference laboratory in Spain using both colorimetric and real-time assays, the overall reproducibility achieved 84.5%.

Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge in which LAMP has been clinically evaluated on blood samples in a resource-poor malaria-endemic area. The colorimetric LAMP proved to be more sensitive than microscopy and RDTs for malaria diagnosis in field conditions. Furthermore, LAMP showed an acceptable level of reproducibility in a reference laboratory. The possibility to use LAMP in a real-time format in a portable device reinforces the reliability of the assay for molecular diagnosis of malaria in resource-poor laboratories in endemic areas.

Keywords: Angola; Field conditions; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP); Malaria; Plasmodium spp.; Point of care (POC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no competing interests regarding this publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of Angola indicating Benguela Province, Benguela municipalities, and Cubal municipality. a Benguela Province. b Benguela municipalities (Catumbela, Benguela, Caimambo, Cubal, and Ganda) which participated in this study. c Cubal municipality: red dots indicate the urban communes (1 = Tumbulo; 2 = Cubal Sede; 3 = Yambala: 4 = Capupa) which participated in this study; blue dot indicates the position of Hospital Nossa Senhora da Paz (HNSP). Map was made using Datawrapper free software available online (https://www.datawrapper.de/) and Microsoft PowerPoint program
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Venn diagrams for comparison of microscopy, RDT, and field-cLAMP in field trials. a Distribution of the samples with Plasmodium spp.-positive results for at least one test. b Samples with Plasmodium spp.-negative results for at least one test. RDT, rapid diagnostic test; Field-cLAMP, colorimetric field LAMP assay
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Venn diagrams for three-way comparison of field-cLAMP, lab-cLAMP, and lab-qLAMP assays. a Distribution of the samples with Plasmodium spp.-positive results for at least one LAMP test. b Distribution of the samples with Plasmodium spp.-negative results for at least one LAMP test. Field-cLAMP, colorimetric field LAMP assay; Lab-cLAMP, colorimetric laboratory LAMP assay; Lab-qLAMP, real-time laboratory LAMP assay

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tavares W, Morais J, Martins JF, Scalsky RJ, Stabler TC, Medeiros MM, et al. Malaria in Angola: recent progress, challenges and future opportunities using parasite demography studies. Malar J BioMed Central. 2022;21:396. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashley EA, Pyae Phyo A, Woodrow CJ. Malaria. Lancet. 2018;391:1608–1621. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30324-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). World malaria report 2022. 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria.... Accessed 1 Mar 2023.
    1. Fitri LE, Widaningrum T, Endharti AT, Prabowo MH, Winaris N, Nugraha RYB. Malaria diagnostic update: from conventional to advanced method. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36:1–14. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24314. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maltha J, Gillet P, Jacobs J. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests in endemic settings. Clin Microbiol Infect Eur Soc Clin Infect Dis. 2013;19:399–407. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12151. - DOI - PubMed

Supplementary concepts