Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 18:17:1070404.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1070404. eCollection 2023.

Challenges of neural interfaces for stroke motor rehabilitation

Affiliations

Challenges of neural interfaces for stroke motor rehabilitation

Carmen Vidaurre et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

More than 85% of stroke survivors suffer from different degrees of disability for the rest of their lives. They will require support that can vary from occasional to full time assistance. These conditions are also associated to an enormous economic impact for their families and health care systems. Current rehabilitation treatments have limited efficacy and their long-term effect is controversial. Here we review different challenges related to the design and development of neural interfaces for rehabilitative purposes. We analyze current bibliographic evidence of the effect of neuro-feedback in functional motor rehabilitation of stroke patients. We highlight the potential of these systems to reconnect brain and muscles. We also describe all aspects that should be taken into account to restore motor control. Our aim with this work is to help researchers designing interfaces that demonstrate and validate neuromodulation strategies to enforce a contingent and functional neural linkage between the central and the peripheral nervous system. We thus give clues to design systems that can improve or/and re-activate neuroplastic mechanisms and open a new recovery window for stroke patients.

Keywords: motor rehabilitation; neural interfaces; neurofeedback; rehabilitative technology; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EL-L was employed by Bitbrain. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual summary of different neural control modalities coupled with different peripheral actuators proposed for upper-limb rehabilitation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajiboye A. B., Willett F. R., Young D. R., Memberg W. D., Murphy B. A., Miller J. P., et al. . (2017). Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet 389, 1821–1830. 10.1016/S0140-673630601-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson N. R., Blakely T., Schalk G., Leuthardt E. C., Moran D. W. (2012). Electrocorticographic (ECoG) correlates of human arm movements. Exp. Brain Res. 223, 1–10. 10.1007/s00221-012-3226-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ang K. K., Chua K. S. G., Phua K. S., Wang C., Chin Z. Y., Kuah C. W. K., et al. . (2015). A randomized controlled trial of eeg-based motor imagery brain-computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 46, 310–320. 10.1177/1550059414522229 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ang K. K., Guan C., Phua K. S., Wang C., Zhou L., Tang K. Y., et al. . (2014). Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Front. Neuroeng. 7, 30. 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antelis J. M., Montesano L., Ramos-Murguialday A., Birbaumer N., Minguez J. (2016). Decoding upper limb movement attempt from eeg measurements of the contralesional motor cortex in chronic stroke patients. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64, 99–111. 10.1109/TBME.2016.2541084 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources