Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44514.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.44514. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Temporary Anchorage Devices

Affiliations
Review

Temporary Anchorage Devices

Shalabh Baxi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Reaction to the force application is observed in the clinical scenarios as anchorage loss, which is the unwanted movement of the teeth. A plethora of approaches have been developed over time in orthodontics to overcome anchorage loss. These approaches are termed anchorage reinforcement procedures. Anchorage loss refers to the unintended movement or shifting of teeth that are intended to remain stable and serve as anchoring points during orthodontic treatment. This loss of stability can occur in various dimensions, including horizontal, vertical, or transverse, and can result in undesired changes to the overall positioning and alignment of teeth. Anchorage can be termed as conventional intraoral anchorage which usually leads to significant anchorage loss. The conventional extraoral anchorage such as headgear suffers from the issue of compliance.

Keywords: anchorage; mini screw; orthodontic bone screws; orthodontics; temporary anchorage devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Cope JB. Semin Orthod. 2005;1:3–9.
    1. Nanda R, Uribe FA, Yadav S. USA: Elsevier; 2019. Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.
    1. 'Safe zones’: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:191–197. - PubMed
    1. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:230–235. - PubMed
    1. Lin JJJ. Yong Chieh Co press. China: Yong Chieh; 2007. Creative Orthodontics Blending the Damon System & TADS to Manage Difficult Malocclusions.

LinkOut - more resources