Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44541.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.44541. eCollection 2023 Sep.

A Radiation Oncology Board Exam of ChatGPT

Affiliations
Editorial

A Radiation Oncology Board Exam of ChatGPT

Andrew B Barbour et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) models improve and become widely integrated into healthcare systems, healthcare providers must understand the strengths and limitations of AI tools to realize the full spectrum of potential patient-care benefits. However, most providers have a poor understanding of AI, leading to distrust and poor adoption of this emerging technology. To bridge this divide, this editorial presents a novel view of ChatGPT's current capabilities in the medical field of radiation oncology. By replicating the format of the oral qualification exam required for radiation oncology board certification, we demonstrate ChatGPT's ability to analyze a commonly encountered patient case, make diagnostic decisions, and integrate information to generate treatment recommendations. Through this simulation, we highlight ChatGPT's strengths and limitations in replicating human decision-making in clinical radiation oncology, while providing an accessible resource to educate radiation oncologists on the capabilities of AI chatbots.

Keywords: ai & robotics in healthcare; ai in medicine; ai tools; radiation oncology; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review. Secinaro S, Calandra D, Secinaro A, Muthurangu V, Biancone P. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21:125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ChatGPT: can a natural language processing tool be trusted for radiation oncology use? Ebrahimi B, Howard A, Carlson DJ, Al-Hallaq H. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;116:977–983. - PubMed
    1. Exploring healthcare professionals' understanding and experiences of artificial intelligence technology use in the delivery of healthcare: an integrative review. Shinners L, Aggar C, Grace S, Smith S. Health Informatics J. 2020;26:1225–1236. - PubMed
    1. Readiness to embrace artificial intelligence among medical doctors and students: questionnaire-based study. Boillat T, Nawaz FA, Rivas H. JMIR Med Educ. 2022;8:0. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources