Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 4;31(10):608.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08059-w.

Concerns raised by people treated for head and neck cancer: a secondary analysis of audiotaped consultations in a health services follow-up clinic

Corrie Dicks  1 , Simon N Rogers  2   3 , Anastasios Kanatas  4 , Derek Lowe  5 , Calum McHale  1 , Gerry Humphris  6
Affiliations

Concerns raised by people treated for head and neck cancer: a secondary analysis of audiotaped consultations in a health services follow-up clinic

Corrie Dicks et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: People treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) face various barriers in communicating concerns with consultants. Our aim was to investigate the number of concerns raised between patients using the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) and those who did not. The PCI is a 57-item prompt list used in routine HNC follow-up clinics. Additionally, we aimed to examine whether who initiated the concerns differed between groups and the factors that may predict this initiation.

Methods: Secondary data analysis included 67 participants across 15 HNC consultants from specialist cancer centres in Liverpool and Leeds. Seven consultants utilised the PCI and eight did not, assigned by preferential and random assignment.

Results: Patients in the PCI group raised on average 2.5 more concerns than patients in the non-PCI group (p < .001). There was no significant relationship between group and who initiated the first concern (p = .28). A mixed-effects logistic regression was found to significantly predict who initiated the first concern in consultations (p < .05).

Discussion: The number of concerns raised by patients increased when the PCI was introduced pre-HNC consultation. A number of factors were shown to predict the number of concerns raised in consultations by both patient and consultant. As concerns may not be raised further following the concern mentioned, we propose that the discussion of concerns needs to be maintained by the clinician throughout the consultation and not solely at the start.

Conclusion: The PCI promoted the sharing of concerns in follow-up consultations between patient and consultant.

Keywords: Communication; Oncology; Prompt sheets; Psychological intervention, coding transcripts, multi-level modelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Eide H, et al. Physician communication in different phases of a consultation at an oncology outpatient clinic related to patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):259–266. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00225-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fallowfield LJ. Treatment decision-making in breast cancer: the patient-doctor relationship. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112(Suppl 1):5–13. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0077-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teutsch C. Patient-doctor communication. Med Clin North Am. 2003;87(5):1115–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00066-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dimoska A, et al. Can a “prompt list” empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions? Cancer. 2008;113(2):225–237. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23543. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim L, et al. Doctor-patient communication, knowledge, and question prompt lists in reducing preoperative anxiety: a randomized control study. Asian J Surg. 2011;34(4):175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2011.11.002. - DOI - PubMed