Measurement accuracy of a microwave doppler sensor beneath the mattress as a continuous respiratory rate monitor: a method comparison study
- PMID: 37792139
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-023-01081-7
Measurement accuracy of a microwave doppler sensor beneath the mattress as a continuous respiratory rate monitor: a method comparison study
Abstract
Purpose: Non-contact continuous respiratory rate monitoring is preferred for early detection of patient deterioration. However, this technique is under development; a gold standard respiratory monitor has not been established. Therefore, this prospective observational method comparison study aimed to compare the measurement accuracy of a non-contact continuous respiratory rate monitor, a microwave Doppler sensor positioned beneath the mattress, with that of other monitors.
Methods: The respiratory rate of intensive care unit patients was simultaneously measured using a microwave Doppler sensor, capnography, thoracic impedance pneumography, and a piezoelectric sensor beneath the mattress. Bias and 95% limits of agreement between the respiratory rate measured using capnography (standard reference) and that measured using the other three methods were calculated using Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measures. Clarke error grid (CEG) analysis evaluated the sensor's ability to assist in correct clinical decision-making.
Results: Eighteen participants were included, and 2,307 data points were analyzed. The bias values (95% limits of agreement) of the microwave Doppler sensor, thoracic impedance pneumography, and piezoelectric sensor were 0.2 (- 4.8 to 5.2), 1.5 (- 4.4 to 7.4), and 0.4 (- 4.0 to 4.8) breaths per minute, respectively. Clinical decisions evaluated using CEG analyses were correct 98.1% of the time for the microwave Doppler sensor, which was similar to the performance of the other devices.
Conclusion: The microwave Doppler sensor had a small bias but relatively low precision, similar to other devices. In CEG analyses, the risk of each monitor leading to inadequate clinical decision-making was low.
Trial registration number: UMIN000038900, February 1, 2020.
Keywords: Intensive care units; Microwaves; Non-contact monitoring; Patient monitoring; Respiratory rate.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Malycha J, Bonnici T, Clifton DA, Ludbrook G, Young JD, Watkinson PJ. Patient centred variables with univariate associations with unplanned ICU admission: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0820-1 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Andersen LW, Kim WY, Chase M, Berg KM, Mortensen SJ, Moskowitz A, Novack V, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW. ; American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines(®) – Resuscitation Investigators (2016) The prevalence and significance of abnormal vital signs prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 98:112–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.016 .
-
- Buist M, Bernard S, Nguyen TV, Moore G, Anderson J. Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study. Resuscitation. 2004;62:137–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.03.005 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cuthbertson BH, Boroujerdi M, McKie L, Aucott L, Prescott G. Can physiological variables and early warning scoring systems allow early recognition of the deteriorating surgical patient? Crit Care Med. 2007;35:402–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000254826.10520.875 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hillman KM, Bristow PJ, Chey T, Daffurn K, Jacques T, Norman SL, Bishop GF, Simmons G. Antecedents to hospital deaths. Intern Med J. 2001;31:343–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-5994.2001.00077.x . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources