Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;193(2):945-947.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03540-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

Aural microsuction: an analysis of post-procedure patient safety incidents

Niall J McInerney  1   2 , Nick O'Keeffe  3   4 , Tara Mackle  3
Affiliations

Aural microsuction: an analysis of post-procedure patient safety incidents

Niall J McInerney et al. Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Aural microsuction can be associated with delayed syncopal and vertiginous events, which can lead to serious adverse patient safety incidents.

Objective: This article highlights the serious risks associated with microsuction.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of the hospital risk database over a 2-year period.

Results: Three patients experienced severe adverse events post microsuction. Two patients fell down the stairs after microsuction, with one suffering a lower limb fracture. One patient experienced loss of consciousness and subsequent head trauma post microsuction.

Conclusions and significance: Whilst aural microsuction is universally accepted to be a low-risk procedure, subsequent serious morbidity can occur. Implementation and awareness of local safety policies are imperative to avoid post-procedure injury.

Keywords: Falls; Microsuction; Patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clegg A, Loveman E, Gospodarevskaya E (2010) The safety and effectiveness of different methods of earwax removal: a systematic review and Economic Evaluation. Health Technol Assess 14(28). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14280
    1. Pothier DD, Hall C, Gillett S (2006) A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic removal of wax: a randomised clinical trial. Clin Otolaryngol 31(5):375–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01288.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gray RF, Nicolaides AR (1988) Vertigo following aural suction: can it be prevented? Clin Otolaryngol 13(4):285–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb01133.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Addams-Williams J, Howarth A, Phillipps JJ (2010) Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(12):1863–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405010-1326-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prowse SJ, Mulla O (2014) Aural microsuction for wax impaction: survey of efficacy and patient perception. J Laryngol Otol 128(7):621–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215114000796 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources