High familiar faces have both eye recognition and holistic processing advantages
- PMID: 37794299
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02792-4
High familiar faces have both eye recognition and holistic processing advantages
Abstract
People recognize familiar faces better than unfamiliar faces. However, it remains unknown whether familiarity affects part-based and/or holistic processing. Wang et al., Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 559 (2015), Vision Research, 157, 89-96 (2019) found both enhanced part-based and holistic processing in eye relative to mouth regions (i.e., in a region-selective manner) for own-race and own-species faces, i.e., faces with more experience. Here, we examined the role of face familiarity in eyes (part-based, region-selective) and holistic processing. Face familiarity was tested at three levels: high-familiar (faces of students from the same department and the same class who attended almost all courses together), low-familiar (faces of students from the same department but different classes who attended some courses together), and unfamiliar (faces of schoolmates from different departments who seldom attended the same courses). Using the old/new task in Experiment 1, we found that participants recognized eyes of high-familiar faces better than low-familiar and unfamiliar ones, while similar performance was observed for mouths, indicating a region-selective, eyes familiarity effect. Using the "Perceptual field" paradigm in Experiment 2, we observed a stronger inversion effect for high-familiar faces, a weaker inversion effect for low-familiar faces, but a non-significant inversion effect for unfamiliar faces, indicating that face familiarity plays a role in holistic processing. Taken together, our results suggest that familiarity, like other experience-based variables (e.g., race and species), can improve both eye processing and holistic processing.
Keywords: Eye processing; Face recognition; Familiarity; Holistic processing; Part-based processing.
© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
A more featural based processing for the self-face: An eye-tracking study.Conscious Cogn. 2022 Oct;105:103400. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103400. Epub 2022 Aug 26. Conscious Cogn. 2022. PMID: 36030615
-
Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.080. Epub 2018 Jun 30. Neuroimage. 2018. PMID: 29966716 Free PMC article.
-
Familiarity facilitates feature-based face processing.PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178895. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28582439 Free PMC article.
-
Face familiarity feelings, the right temporal lobe and the possible underlying neural mechanisms.Brain Res Rev. 2007 Nov;56(1):214-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Brain Res Rev. 2007. PMID: 17822771 Review.
-
The "parts and wholes" of face recognition: A review of the literature.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct;69(10):1876-89. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016. PMID: 26886495 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Temporal dynamics and task-dependent neural mechanisms in facial symmetry processing.Exp Brain Res. 2025 Apr 2;243(5):106. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07059-y. Exp Brain Res. 2025. PMID: 40172618
References
-
- Bacci, N., Houlton, T. M. R., Briers, N., & Steyn, M. (2021). Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 135(5), 1965–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02512-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bortolon, C., Lorieux, S., & Raffard, S. (2018). Self- or familiar-face recognition advantage? New insight using ambient images. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1396–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1327982 - DOI
-
- Brooks, K. R., & Kemp, R. I. (2007). Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: Beyond the internal/external feature distinction. Perception, 36(11), 1646–1659. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5675 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.207 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Burton, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2012). Unfamiliar Face Perception. In G. Rhodes, A. Calder, M. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources