Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;12(10):2437-2456.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00871-5. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Lorenzo Piemonti et al. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Polymorphonuclear cell influx into the interstitial and bronchoalveolar spaces is a cardinal feature of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), principally mediated by interleukin-8 (IL-8). We sought to determine whether reparixin, a novel IL-8 pathway inhibitor, could reduce disease progression in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods: In this Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were randomized 2:1 to receive oral reparixin 1200 mg three times daily or placebo for up to 21 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28, with key secondary endpoints being the proportion of patients free of respiratory failure at Day 60, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission by Day 28 and time to recovery by Day 28.

Results: Of 279 patients randomized, 182 received at least one dose of reparixin and 88 received placebo. The proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28 was similar in the two groups {83.5% versus 80.7%; odds ratio 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75, 3.51]; p = 0.216}. There were no statistically significant differences in the key secondary endpoints, but a numerically higher proportion of patients in the reparixin group were alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 60 (88.7% versus 84.6%; p = 0.195), fewer required ICU admissions by Day 28 (15.8% versus 21.7%; p = 0.168), and a higher proportion recovered by Day 28 compared with placebo (81.6% versus 74.9%; p = 0.167). Fewer patients experienced adverse events with reparixin than placebo (45.6% versus 54.5%), most mild or moderate intensity and not related to study treatment.

Conclusions: This trial did not meet the primary efficacy endpoints, yet reparixin showed a trend toward limiting disease progression as an add-on therapy in COVID-19 severe pneumonia and was well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04878055, EudraCT: 2020-005919-51.

Keywords: COVID-19; Interleukin-8 (IL-8); Reparixin; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lorenzo Piemonti has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Giovanni Landoni has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Antonio Voza declares consulting fees from Sildeha Pharma Swisse; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Minerva Medica and Viatris; payment for expert testimony from GlaxoSmithKline, Alfa Sigma (to his institution), and Aurora Biopharma; and unpaid roles as guest editor of special issue on COVID-19: Prognosis and Long-term Sequelae’ on Viruses, and an advisory board for Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Massimo Puoti declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, and AstraZeneca, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Ivan Gentile declares departmental grants from Gilead; personal fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, AbbVie, Gilead, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, SOBI, Nordic/InfectoPharm, Angelini, Abbott, and Basilea; support for attending a meeting from Janssen and Gilead; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD, AbbVie, Gilead, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, SOBI, Nordic/InfectoPharm, Angelini, Abbott, and Basilea, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Nicola Coppola has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Stefano Nava has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Alessia Mattei has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Franco Marinangeli declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Grunenthal, Mundipharma, and MSD, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Giulia Marchetti declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, ViiV, MSD, Shionogi, and Angelini; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Jannsen and ViiV; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Viiv and Gilead, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Paolo Bonfanti declares consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Viiv, Gilead, Merck, Jannsen, and Pfizer, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Claudio Maria Mastroianni declares consulting fees from Gilead and VIIV; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, VIIV, Gilead, Menarini, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Menarini, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Matteo Bassetti declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Angelini, Astellas, Bayer, Biomerieux, Cidara, Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Nabriva, and Shionogi, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Angelini, Astellas, Bayer, Biomerieux, Cidara, Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Nabriva, and Shionogi, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Ernesto Crisafulli declares a grant from GlaxoSmithKline; honoraria for lecturing for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Qbgroup, and Sanofi; honoraria for scientific advisory boards for Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Paolo Antonio Grossi declares consulting fees from Takeda, MSD, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Biotest and Gilead; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Reithera, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Alberto Zangrillo has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Antonio Desai has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Marco Merli declares grants or contracts from Gilead, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. Maria Foggia has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Marco Carpano has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Lorenzo Schiavoni has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Antonella D’Arminio Monforte has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Luca Bisi has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Gianluca Russo declares support for attending a meeting from Gilead, outside the scope of the current manuscript. Fabiana Busti has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Cristina Rovelli has no other conflicts of interest to disclose. Elisabetta Perrotta, Giovanni Goisis, Elizabeth M. Gavioli, Sophie Toya, Maria De Pizzol, Flavio Mantelli, Marcello Allegretti, and Enrico Maria Minnella are employees of Dompé Farmaceutici SpA, the sponsor of the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. The full analysis set and the safety population consisted of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The full analysis set was performed according to the intent-to-treat principle and was used for the efficacy analyses. The safety set was used for the safety analyses
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at each visit throughout the study (full analysis set)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2020.2648. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu J, Liu Y, Xiang P, Pu L, Xiong H, Li C, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts critical illness patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in the early stage. J Transl Med. 2020;18:206. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02374-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeng Z-Y, Feng S-D, Chen G-P, Wu J-N. Predictive value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for disease deterioration and serious adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:80. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05796-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masso-Silva JA, Moshensky A, Lam MTY, Odish MF, Patel A, Xu L, et al. Increased peripheral blood neutrophil activation phenotypes and neutrophil extracellular trap formation in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a case series and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74:479–489. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab437. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haick AK, Rzepka JP, Brandon E, Balemba OB, Miura TA. Neutrophils are needed for an effective immune response against pulmonary rat coronavirus infection, but also contribute to pathology. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:578–590. doi: 10.1099/VIR.0.061986-0/CITE/REFWORKS. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data