Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 5;16(1):255.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06526-5.

Organisational benefits of undertaking research in healthcare: an approach to uncover impact

Affiliations
Review

Organisational benefits of undertaking research in healthcare: an approach to uncover impact

Judith Holliday et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

There is increasing focus to review the societal impact of research through assessment and research excellence frameworks. These often link to financial and reputational incentives within the academic community. However, timeframes to demonstrate impact using these approaches are often long and are not designed to show benefit to service collaborators who require evidence of improvement and change to their services more immediately. Impacts that are measured this way may also miss out on unintended and positive impacts that occur as by-products of research, or through the 'ripple effect' that research may have on practice. Importantly, demonstrating how research makes a difference can improve the research culture in services, and motivations in service partners to become, and stay involved in research. This article describes, and provides access to, a tool called VICTOR (making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research) that was developed by a community of practice involving 12 NHS organisations through blending evidence from the literature, practice and service users. We describe the types of impact that have been collected by VICTOR and explore how collecting impact in this way might help research-practice partnerships and inform research methodologies and may be useful to show impacts alongside, and shortly after the research process.

Keywords: By-products of research; Coproduction; Research collaborations; Research impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Department of Health. 2006 Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy London:: Department of Health; Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
    1. Department of Health and Social Care. 2020. Best Research for Best Health: the next chapter. London: Department of Health and Social Care. Available at https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/best-research-for-best-health-....
    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nutley S, Boaz A, Davies H, Fraser A. New development: what works now? Continuity and change in the use of evidence to improve public policy and service delivery. Public Money & Management. 2019;39(4):310–6. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1598202. - DOI
    1. van der Graaf P, Cheetham M, Redgate S, Humble C, Adamson A. Co-production in local government: process, codification and capacity building of new knowledge in collective reflection spaces. Workshops findings from a UK mixed methods study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–13. - PMC - PubMed