Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Oct 5;11(1):305.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01351-8.

Comparative risk perceptions of switching to JUUL vs. continued smoking and subsequent switching away from cigarettes: a longitudinal observational study

Arielle Selya  1 , Saul Shiffman  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Comparative risk perceptions of switching to JUUL vs. continued smoking and subsequent switching away from cigarettes: a longitudinal observational study

Arielle Selya et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence indicates that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) pose lower risk than cigarettes; however, many smokers harbor misperceptions that ENDS are equally or more harmful, possibly deterring them from switching. This study examines whether comparative risk perceptions of JUUL vs. smoking are associated with subsequent switching, among smokers who recently purchased JUUL.

Methods: N = 16,996 current established smokers who recently purchased a JUUL Starter Kit were followed 6 times over 12 months. Comparative risk perceptions were assessed using both direct and indirect measures (i.e., contrasting JUUL and smoking directly in questions, and deriving from separate absolute scales). Repeated-measures logistic regression examined switching across follow-up (no smoking in past 30 days) as a function of baseline risk perceptions, adjusting for demographics and baseline smoking behavior.

Results: Perceiving JUUL as less harmful than smoking was associated with higher switching rates, using both direct (e.g., adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.48 for "JUUL much less" vs. "more/much more harmful") and indirect (AOR = 1.07, for each 10-unit increase in fraction; AOR = 1.51 for highest (6-100) vs. lowest (0 to < 1) fraction categories) comparative risk measures (all p < 0.0001). Among the subset smoking 10 + cigarettes per day, associations between risk perceptions and switching were more pronounced (AOR = 2.51 for "JUUL much less" vs. "more/much more harmful"; AOR = 1.81 for 6-100 vs. 0 to < 1 fraction, both p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Smokers who perceive JUUL as less harmful than cigarettes have higher odds of switching. Future research should examine whether messaging which aligns comparative risk perceptions with current evidence can facilitate switching, especially among heavier smokers.

Keywords: Cigarettes; Electronic nicotine Delivery Systems; JUUL; Risk perceptions; Smoking; Switching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Through PinneyAssociates, Inc., authors AS, and SS provide consulting services on tobacco harm reduction on an exclusive basis to Juul Labs, Inc (JLI). This study was funded by JLI. The preparation of this manuscript was supported by JLI, and JLI reviewed and provided comments on a near-final draft of the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
AORs and switching rates by comparative risk perception groups, among all baseline established smokers. A and B: Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for switching (y-axis) for risk perception groups (x-axis), for both direct (A) and indirect (B) comparative risk perceptions. C and D: Average adjusted switching rates across direct (C) and indirect (D) risk perception groups. Analyses adjust for baseline smoking history and demographic characteristic (see text for details) (see text for details). Brackets and * indicate significance at p<.05 between adjacent categories based on GEE model (see text). Indirect comparative risk fraction = 1 indicates equal perceived risk of switching to JUUL and continued smoking, and is included in the “=1 to <2” group. Indirect risk fraction <1 (“=0 to <1” group) indicates that continued smoking is perceived to be less risky than switching to JUUL; values > 1 indicate that switching to JUUL is perceived to be less risky than continued smoking
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
AORs and switching rates by comparative risk perception groups, among baseline established smokers with 10+CPD. A and B: Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for switching (y-axis) for risk perception groups (x-axis), for both direct (A) and indirect (B) comparative risk perceptions. C and D: Average adjusted switching rates across direct (C) and indirect (D) risk perception groups. Analyses adjust for baseline smoking history and demographic characteristic (see text for details) (see text for details). Brackets and * indicate significance at p<.05 between adjacent categories based on GEE model (see text). Indirect comparative risk fraction = 1 indicates equal perceived risk of switching to JUUL and continued smoking, and is included in the “=1 to <2” group. Indirect risk fraction <1 (“=0 to <1” group) indicates that continued smoking is perceived to be less risky than switching to JUUL; values > 1 indicate that switching to JUUL is perceived to be less risky than continued smoking
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hartmann-Boyce J, Butler AR, Theodoulou A, Onakpoya IJ, Hajek P, Bullen C, et al. Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Addiction. 2023;118(3):539–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McNeill A, Simonavičius E, Brose LS, Taylor E, East K, Zuikova E, et al. September 2022. A report commissioned by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. London: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities; 2022. Nicotine vaping in England: an evidence update including health risks and perceptions.
    1. Balfour DJK, Benowitz NL, Colby SM, Hatsukami DK, Lando HA, Leischow SJ, et al. Balancing consideration of the risks and benefits of E-Cigarettes. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(9):1661–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parms TA, Valverde R, Park-Lee E, Graham-Glover BS, Cunningham CS, Sawdey MD, et al. Symptoms of tobacco dependence among middle and high school tobacco users – data from the 2019–2020 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Addict Behav. 2023;137:107537. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartmann-Boyce J, Butler AR, Theodoulou A, Onakpoya IJ, Hajek P, Bullen C, et al. Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Addiction. 2022;118(3):539–545. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types