Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 1;115(20):1881-1882.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2255. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

Recommendation to change the peer review process

L David Wise  1 , Stephen B Harris  2 , William S Webster  3 , John M DeSesso  4
Affiliations

Recommendation to change the peer review process

L David Wise et al. Birth Defects Res. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Brainard, J. (2021). The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh3175. viewed at https://www.science.org/content/article/450-question-should-journals-pay...
    1. Bravo, G., Grimaldo, F., López-Iñesta, E., Mehmani, B., & Squazzoni, F. (2019). The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals. Nature Communications, 10, 322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2
    1. Cheah, P. Y., & Piasecki, J. (2022). Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers? The Lancet, 399, 1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02804-X
    1. Communications Physics. (2022). Transparent peer review: The value is clear. Communications on Physics, 5, 108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00891-6
    1. Cosgrove, A., & Cheifet, B. (2018). Transparent peer review trial: The results. Genome Biology, 19, 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1584-0

LinkOut - more resources