Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 37799180
- PMCID: PMC10550369
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772175
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Circulatory shock is a common and important diagnosis in the critical care environment. Hemodynamic monitoring is quintessential in the management of shock. The currently used hemodynamic monitoring devices not only measure cardiac output but also provide data related to the prediction of fluid responsiveness, extravascular lung water, and also pulmonary vascular permeability. Additionally, these devices are minimally invasive and associated with fewer complications. The area of hemodynamic monitoring is progressively evolving with a trend toward the use of minimally invasive devices in this area. The critical care physician should be well-versed with current hemodynamic monitoring limitations and stay updated with the upcoming advances in this field so that optimal therapy can be delivered to patients in circulatory shock.
Keywords: circulatory shock; fluid responsiveness; hemodynamic monitoring; personalized hemodynamic monitoring.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Accuracy assessment of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in the hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):3506-3512. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1731. Ann Palliat Med. 2020. PMID: 33065801
-
[A Chinese consensus statement on the clinical application of transesophageal echocardiography for critical care (2019)].Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 1;58(12):869-882. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2019.12.002. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31775449 Chinese.
-
Evolving concepts of hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill patients.Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;19(4):220-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.154556. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25878430 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Experts consensus on the management of the right heart function in critically ill patients].Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 1;56(12):962-973. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.12.017. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 29202543 Chinese.
-
A review of hemodynamic monitoring techniques, methods and devices for the emergency physician.Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;35(9):1335-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.036. Epub 2017 Mar 18. Am J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28366285 Review.
Cited by
-
Tidal Volume Challenge to Assess Volume Responsiveness with Dynamic Preload Indices During Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):101. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010101. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39797182 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical decision guidance by an automated, brachial cuff-based cardiac output assessment in patients with shock under treatment: a pilot study in Athens, Greece.Acute Crit Care. 2025 May;40(2):273-281. doi: 10.4266/acc.001728. Epub 2025 May 23. Acute Crit Care. 2025. PMID: 40405511 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pinsky M R. Hemodynamic evaluation and monitoring in the ICU. Chest. 2007;132(06):2020–2029. - PubMed
-
- Marik P E, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134(01):172–178. - PubMed
-
- Eskesen T G, Wetterslev M, Perner A. Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(03):324–332. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources