Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44654.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.44654. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Exploring the Role of Simulation Training in Improving Surgical Skills Among Residents: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Exploring the Role of Simulation Training in Improving Surgical Skills Among Residents: A Narrative Review

Swizel Ann Cardoso et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The role of simulation in medical education is crucial to the development of surgeons' skills. Surgical simulation can be used to improve surgical skills in a secure and risk-free environment. Animal models, simulated patients, virtual reality, and mannequins are some types of surgical simulation. As a result, feedback encourages students to reflect on their strengths and weaknesses, enabling them to focus on improvement. Healthcare simulation is a strong educational instrument, and the main goal of this is to give the students an opportunity to do a practical application of what they have learned through theory. Before taking it to the patients, they will already have certain tools they have previously acquired during the practice. This makes it easier for students to identify the knowledge gaps that they must fill to improve patient outcomes. Moreover, simulation brings a wonderful opportunity for students to acquire skills, gain confidence, and experience success before working with real patients, especially when their clinical exposure is limited. The use of simulation to teach technical skills to surgical trainees has become more prevalent. The cost of setting up a simulation lab ranges from $100,000 to $300,000. There are several ways to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based surgical training. Repetitive surgical simulation training can improve speed and fluidity in general surgical skills in comparison to conventional training. Few previous studies compared learners who received structured simulation training to a group of trainees who did not receive any simulation training in single-center randomized control research. Significantly faster and less time-consuming skill proficiency was noticeable in simulated trainees. Despite being anxious in the operating room for the first time, simulated trainees completed the surgery on time, demonstrating the effectiveness of surgical simulation training. Traditional surgical training involves senior-surgeon supervision in the operating room. In simulation-based training, the trainees have full control over clinical scenarios and settings; however, guidance and assessment are also crucial. Simulators allow users to practice tasks under conditions resembling real-life scenarios. Simulators can be compared with traditional surgical training methods for different reasons. For example, intraoperative bleeding may occasionally show up not only visibly on the screen but also by shaking the trocars erratically. Without haptics, training on virtual simulators can cause one's pulling and pushing forces, which are frequently greater than what the tissue needs, to be distorted. A good method of simulation training is using virtual reality simulators with haptics and simulated patients. The availability of these facilities is limited, though, and a typical session might include an exercise involving stacking sugar cubes and box trainers. The degree of expertise or competency is one area that needs clarification as medical education transitions to a competency-based paradigm. The article aims to provide an overview of simulation, methods of simulation training, and the key role and importance of surgical simulation in improving skills in surgical residents.

Keywords: laparoscpic surgery; simulation; simulation based continuing education (sbce); simulation validity; skill training; skills and simulation training; surgery resident performance; surgical; virtual reality simulation; virtual simulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Methods of evaluating simulation-based surgical training
Figure 2
Figure 2. Measure of Reliability
Figure 3
Figure 3. Measure of Validity

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Current status of simulation training in urology: a non-systematic review. Kozan AA, Chan LH, Biyani CS. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S237808. Res Rep Urol. 2020;12:111–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virtual reality simulation-the future of orthopaedic training? A systematic review and narrative analysis. Clarke E. Adv Simul (Lond) 2021;6:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Transferability of simulation-based training in laparoscopic surgeries: a systematic review. Spiliotis AE, Spiliotis PM, & Palios IM, et al. Mini Inv Sur. 2020;5879485 - PMC - PubMed
    1. The impact of surgical simulation on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Meling TR, Meling TR. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44:843–854. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simulation in surgery: a review. Tan SS, Sarker SK. Scott Med J. 2011;56:104–109. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources