Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):66-74.
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00809.

Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant-level data metaanalysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant-level data metaanalysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration

Marc-André d'Entremont et al. EuroIntervention. .

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials of ultrasound (US)-guided transfemoral access (TFA) for coronary procedures have shown mixed results.

Aims: We aimed to compare US-guided versus non-US-guided TFA from randomised data in an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Methods: We completed a systematic review and an IPD meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials comparing US-guided versus non-US-guided TFA for coronary procedures. We performed a one-stage mixed-model meta-analysis using the intention-to-treat population from included trials. The primary outcome was a composite of major vascular complications or major bleeding within 30 days.

Results: A total of 2,441 participants (1,208 US-guided, 1,233 non-US-guided) from 4 randomised clinical trials were included. The mean age was 65.5 years, 27.0% were female, and 34.5% underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention. The incidence of major vascular complications or major bleeding (34/1,208 [2.8%] vs 55/1,233 [4.5%]; odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.94; p=0.026) was lower in the US-guided TFA group. In the prespecified subgroup of participants who received a vascular closure device, those randomised to US-guided TFA experienced a reduction in the primary outcome (2.1% vs 5.6%; OR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.69), while no benefit for US guidance was observed in the subgroup without vascular closure devices (4.1% vs 3.3%; OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.65-2.26; interaction p=0.009).

Conclusions: In participants undergoing coronary procedures by TFA, US guidance decreased the composite outcome of major vascular complications or bleeding and may be especially helpful when using vascular closure devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Seto reports receiving grants or contracts from Arena Medical, Philips, and ACIST; payment or honoraria for speakers’ bureaus from Janssen, Terumo, Getinge, and GE HealthCare; consulting fees from Medtronic and Medicure; and reports having equity in Frond Medical. S. Jolly reports receiving grants or contracts from Boston Scientific; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Penumbra. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two-stage fixed-effect and random-effects subgroup meta-analysis for the primary composite outcome by aggregate-level studies (predominantly peripheral vascular disease) and individual participant data studies (exclusively coronary).
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio
Figure 2
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis for the primary composite outcome.
BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; US: ultrasound

References

    1. Gargiulo G, Giacoppo D, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Le May, Bernat I, Romagnoli E, Rao SV, van Leeuwen, Mehta SR, Bertrand OF, Wells GA, Meijers TA, Siontis GCM, Esposito G, Windecker S, Jüni P, Valgimigli M Radial Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials. Circulation. 2022;146:1329–43. - PubMed
    1. Writing Committee Members Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, DiMaio JM, Don CW, Fremes SE, Gaudino MF, Goldberger ZD, Grant MC, Jaswal JB, Kurlansky PA, Mehran R, Metkus TS Jr, Nnacheta LC, Rao SV, Sellke FW, Sharma G, Yong CM, Zwischenberger BA. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:197–215. - PubMed
    1. d’Entremont MA, Marquis-Gravel G, Paradis JM, Bérubé S, Seto AH, Nguyen P, Metha SR, Couture ÉL, Jolly SS. Strategies to Reduce Transfemoral Access Complications in Contemporary Interventional Cardiology. Can J Cardiol. 2023 May 19; - PubMed
    1. Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, Daly TS, Harrison AT, Suh WM, Vera JA, Aston CE, Winters RJ, Patel PM, Hennebry TA, Kern MJ. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:751–8. - PubMed
    1. Jolly SS, AlRashidi S, d’Entremont MA, Alansari O, Brochu B, Heenan L, Skuriat E, Tyrwhitt J, Raco M, Tsang M, Valettas N, Velianou JL, Sheth T, Sibbald M, Mehta SR, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Schwalm JD, Natarajan MK, Kelly A, Akl E, Tawadros S, Camargo M, Faidi W, Bauer J, Moxham R, Nkurunziza J, Dutra G, Winter J. Routine Ultrasonography Guidance for Femoral Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures: The UNIVERSAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:1110–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources