Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 23:7:e52454.
doi: 10.2196/52454.

Establishing the Need for Anticipatory Symptom Guidance and Networked Models of Disease in Adaptive Family Management Among Children With Medical Complexity: Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Establishing the Need for Anticipatory Symptom Guidance and Networked Models of Disease in Adaptive Family Management Among Children With Medical Complexity: Qualitative Study

Jessica Keim-Malpass et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Caregivers of children with medical complexity navigate complex family management tasks for their child both in the hospital and home-based setting. The roles and relationships of members of their social network and the dynamic evolution of these family management tasks have been underexamined.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the structures and processes of family management among caregivers of children with medical complexity, with a focus on the underlying dynamic nature of family management practices and the role of members of their social network.

Methods: This study used a qualitative approach to interview caregivers of children with medical complexity and members of their social network. Caregivers of children with medical complexity were recruited through an academic Children's Hospital Complex Care Clinic in the mid-Atlantic region and interviewed over a period of 1 to 3 days. Responses were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis to construct a new conceptual model. Only caregiver responses are reported here.

Results: In total, 20 caregivers were included in this analysis. Caregiver perspectives revealed the contextual processes that allowed for practices of family management within the setting of rapidly evolving symptoms and health concerns. The dynamic and adaptive nature of this process is a key underlying action supporting this novel conceptual model. The central themes underpinning the adaptive family management model include symptom cues, ongoing surveillance, information gathering, and acute on chronic health concerns. The model also highlights facilitators and threats to successful family management among children with medical complexity and the networked relationship among the structures and processes.

Conclusions: The adaptive family management model provides a basis for further quantitative operationalization and study. Previously described self- or family management frameworks do not account for the underlying dynamic nature of the disease trajectory and the developmental stage progression of the child or adolescent, and our work extends existing work. For future work, there is a defined role for technology-enhanced personalized approaches to home-based monitoring. Due to the disparities caregivers and the children in this population already experience, technology-enhanced approaches must be built alongside key stakeholders with an equity orientation to technology co-development.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/14810.

Keywords: anticipatory symptom management; care coordination; caregiver; caregivers; caregiving; child; children; children with medical complexity; conceptual; constructivist; coordinated care; disability; disease progression models; family; family management; grounded theory; informal care; interview; interviews; mobile phone; model; networked models of disease; pediatric; pediatrics; precision; precision health; qualitative; self-management; situational analysis; social network; social networking; social networks; social support; symptom management; web-based network; web-based networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: JK-M owns equity in Artera, an artificial intelligence cancer biomarker company whose products are not discussed in this unrelated work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adaptive family management conceptual framework to support enhanced anticipatory symptom guidance and networked models of disease.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Watkinson MD, Ehlenbach M, Chung PJ, Kelly M, Werner N, Jolliff A, Katz B, Marleau H, Nacht CL, Warner G, Coller RJ. Interventions in the home and community for medically complex children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2023;151(5):e2022058352. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058352.191050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen E, Kuo DZ, Agrawal R, Berry JG, Bhagat SKM, Simon TD, Srivastava R. Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):529–538. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0910. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21339266 peds.2010-0910 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry JG, Hall M, Neff J, Goodman D, Cohen E, Agrawal R, Kuo D, Feudtner C. Children with medical complexity and Medicaid: spending and cost savings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(12):2199–2206. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0828. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25489039 33/12/2199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trowbridge K, Mische-Lawson L. Families with children with medical complexity and self-management of care: a systematic review of the literature. Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(7):640–658. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.916776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomson J, Shah SS, Simmons JM, Sauers-Ford HS, Brunswick S, Hall D, Kahn RS, Beck AF. Financial and social hardships in families of children with medical complexity. J Pediatr. 2016;172:187–193.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.049. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26897040 S0022-3476(16)00126-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed