Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;124(3):1027-1036.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05327-9. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

Lack of effect of an in-line filter on cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables in healthy subjects

Asghar Abbasi  1 , Khadije Ahmad  2 , Carrie Ferguson  3 , April Soriano  3 , Robert Calmelat  3 , Harry B Rossiter  3 , Richard Casaburi  3 , William W Stringer  3 , Janos Porszasz  3
Affiliations

Lack of effect of an in-line filter on cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables in healthy subjects

Asghar Abbasi et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Pathogen transmission during cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is caused by carrier aerosols generated during respiration.

Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (age range: 34 ± 15; 4 females) were recruited to see if the physiological reactions to ramp-incremental CPET on a cycle ergometer were affected using an in-line filter placed between the mouthpiece and the flow sensor. The tests were in random order with or without an in-line bacterial/viral spirometer filter. The work rate aligned, time interpolated 10 s bin data were compared throughout the exercise period.

Results: From rest to peak exercise, filter use increased only minute ventilation ([Formula: see text]E) (Δ[Formula: see text]E = 1.56 ± 0.70 L/min, P < 0.001) and tidal volume (VT) (ΔVT = 0.10 ± 0.11 L, P = 0.014). Over the entire test, the slope of the residuals for [Formula: see text]CO2 was positive (0.035 ± 0.041 (ΔL/L), P = 0.027). During a ramp-incremental CPET in healthy subjects, an in-line filter increased [Formula: see text]E and VT but not metabolic rate.

Conclusion: In conclusion, using an in-line filter is feasible, does not affect appreciably the physiological variables, and may mitigate risk of aerosol dispersion during CPET.

Keywords: Aerosol-generating procedures; COVID-19; Cardiopulmonary exercise testing; In-line filter; Respiratory viruses; Ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ATS/ACCP (2003) ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:211–277 - DOI
    1. Balady G, Arena R, Sietsema KE, Myers J, Coke L, Fletcher GF, Foreman D, Franklin F, Guazzi M, Gulati M, Keteyian SJ, Lavie CJ, Macko R, Mancini D, Milani RV (2010) Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122:191–225 - DOI
    1. Bhat RR, Schoenike MW, Kowal A, White C, Rouvina J, Hardin CC, Malhotra R, Lewis GD (2021) Feasibility and consistency of results with deployment of an in-line filter for exercise-based evaluations of patients with heart failure during the novel coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. J Cardiac Fail 27:105–108 - DOI
    1. Cao M, Stringer WW, Corey S, Orogian A, Cao R, Calmelat R, Lin F, Casaburi R, Rossiter HB, Porszasz J (2020) Transcutaneous PCO2 for exercise gas exchange efficiency in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis 18:16–25 - DOI
    1. Cowie B, Wadlow I, Yule A, Janssens K, Ward J, Foulkes S, Humphries R, McGain F, Dhillon R, La Gerche A (2023) Aerosol generation during high intensity exercise-implications for COVID-19 transmission. Heart Lung Circ 32:67–78 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources