Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned
- PMID: 37803257
- PMCID: PMC10557269
- DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02051-y
Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned
Abstract
Background: People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) face disability- and travel-related barriers to research participation. We investigate the usefulness and acceptability of asynchronous, online focus groups (AOFGs) for research involving people affected by ALS (patients and family caregivers) and outline lessons learned.
Methods: The ALS Talk Project, consisting of seven AOFGs and 100 participants affected by ALS, provided context for this investigation. Hosted on the secure itracks Board™ platform, participants interacted in a threaded web forum structure. Moderators posted weekly discussion questions and facilitated discussion. Data pertaining to methodology, participant interaction and experience, and moderator technique were analyzed using itracks and NVivo 12 analytics (quantitative) and conventional content analysis and the constant-comparative approach (qualitative).
Results: There was active engagement within groups, with post lengths averaging 111.48 words and a complex network of branching interactions between participants. One third of participant responses included individual reflections without further interaction. Participants affirmed their co-group members, offered practical advice, and discussed shared and differing perspectives. Moderators responded to all posts, indicating presence and probing answers. AOFGs facilitated qualitative and quantitative data-gathering and flexible response to unanticipated events. Although total participation fell below 50% after 10-12 weeks, participants valued interacting with peers in an inclusive, confidential forum. Participants used a variety of personal devices, browsers, and operating systems when interacting on the online platform.
Conclusions: This methodological examination of AOFGs for patient-centred investigations involving people affected by ALS demonstrates their usefulness and acceptability, and advances knowledge of online research methodologies. Lessons learned include: early identification of research goals and participant needs is critical to selecting an AOFG platform; although duration longer than 10-12 weeks may be burdensome in this population, participants were positive about AOFGs; AOFGs offer real world flexibility enabling response to research challenges and opportunities; and, AOGFs can effectively foster safe spaces for sharing personal perspectives and discussing sensitive topics. With moderators playing an important role in fostering engagement, AOFGs facilitated rich data gathering and promoted reciprocity by fostering the exchange of ideas and interaction between peers. Findings may have implications for research involving other neurologically impaired and/or medically vulnerable populations.
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Family caregivers; Online focus groups; Patients; Research design; Research participation.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
SKG, WL, TB, and WSJ declare that they have no competing interests. GW declares a competing financial interest as the CEO of itracks™.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A cross-sectional evaluation of acceptability of an online palliative rehabilitation program for family caregivers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cognitive and behavioral impairments.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 24;22(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07986-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35610609 Free PMC article.
-
Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:10.1177/1609406921990489. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9. Int J Qual Methods. 2021. PMID: 35185443 Free PMC article.
-
What do people affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis want from health communications? Evidence from the ALS Talk Project.Muscle Nerve. 2023 Sep;68(3):286-295. doi: 10.1002/mus.27935. Epub 2023 Jul 18. Muscle Nerve. 2023. PMID: 37462337
-
Cell-based therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 19;12(12):CD011742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011742.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31853962 Free PMC article.
-
An Online Tool to Inform and Educate Caregivers on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:664-665. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210254. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021. PMID: 34042659 Review.
Cited by
-
"…but I know something's not right here": Exploring the diagnosis and disclosure experiences of persons living with ALS.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0301249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301249. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39621705 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Davies L, LeClair KL, Bagley P, Blunt H, Hinton L, Ryan S, et al. Face-to-Face compared with online collected accounts of health and illness experiences: a scoping review. Qual. Health Res. 2020;1049732320935835. - PubMed
-
- Cook K, Jack S, Siden H, Thabane L, Browne G. Innovations in research with medically fragile populations: using bulletin board focus groups. Qual Rep. 2014;19:1–12.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous