Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986;55(6):610-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF00423205.

Effects of cold stress and exercise on fat loss in females

Effects of cold stress and exercise on fat loss in females

S J Murray et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986.

Abstract

A Latin Square design has been used to test the responses of 24 relatively fit young women to 200 minute bouts of exercise performed over 5 day trials under each of three different ambient conditions: 15 degrees C (warm-warm; (WW)); -20 degrees C while inhaling, from a facemask, air heated to 18 degrees C (cold-warm; (CW)); and -20 degrees C (cold-cold; (CC)). In both of the cold environments, special clothing and boots were provided (insulation 0.47 degree C X watt-1 X m-2 and 0.62 degree C X watt-1 X m-2; (4 and 3 CLO units)). All three trials led to a small (0.6-0.7 degree C) rise of rectal temperature, but in the two cold environments mean body temperatures fell by over 1.0 degree C. A large increase of serum ketones occurred under all conditions, and the exercise respiratory quotient suggested some increase of fat utilization, WW (0.85) through CW (0.84) to CC (0.83). A fat loss of about 0.5 kg over the five days was confirmed by hydrostatic weighing and measurement of skinfold thicknesses. This was much less than the change previously observed in men, and moreover, it seemed to be independent of ambient conditions. Possible reasons why cold did not increase fat loss in these women include: a lower relative intensity of exercise; a greater stability of fat stores in women; avoidance of caffeine; a possible translocation of subcutaneous fat to deep fat depots; and a greater desire to "lose weight" irrespective of environmental conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1981;46(4):339-45 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1983 Jan;64(1):19-23 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1984 Aug;27(8):895-902 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Soc Symp. 1976;(41):61-109 - PubMed
    1. J Anat. 1972 May;112(Pt 1):35-9 - PubMed

Publication types