Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 9;18(1):276.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02403-1.

Extra-anatomical left common carotid and subclavian artery bypass followed by aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk

Ryo Suzuki  1 , Masafumi Akita  2 , Suguru Miyazaki  2 , Ryo Shimano  2
Affiliations

Extra-anatomical left common carotid and subclavian artery bypass followed by aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk

Ryo Suzuki et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Total arch replacement (TAR) using a frozen elephant trunk (FET) allows for simultaneous treatment of the aortic arch and descending aortic pathology via median sternotomy. In addition, an extra-anatomical bypass performed between the left common carotid artery (CCA) and subclavian artery (SCA) prior to TAR allowed further proximalisation of the FET prosthesis, facilitated distal anastomosis of the TAR and spared the demanding left subclavian artery (LSA) anastomosis in the deep thorax. We investigated the efficacy of this debranching-first technique, followed by TAR using a frozen elephant trunk, as a two-stage operation for extensive thoracic aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients.

Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients with diffuse degenerative aneurysms from the aortic arch to the descending aorta or chronic aortic dissection who underwent left common carotid to subclavian artery bypass followed by TAR using a frozen elephant trunk and subsequent thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2016 and 2021 were analysed. The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed. The estimated overall survival, 5-year aortic event-free survival, and aortic reintervention rates were analysed.

Results: The average European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II) was 4.7 ± 2.5. The operative mortality rate was 4.1%, with no paraplegia events. The estimated 5-year overall survival, cumulative aortic-related mortality rates were 76.8% and 2%, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall cumulative aortic reintervention rate, including the intended intervention, was 31.3%. The estimated 5-year cumulative rate of non-intended reintervention was 4.5%.

Conclusions: The assessed technique enables a less technically demanding surgery with reasonable outcomes. The estimated 5-year aortic event-free survival and reintervention rates were acceptable, suggesting that multiple stages of alternative open and endovascular interventions, such as this technique, may reduce the morbidity and mortality rates of high-risk patients with diffuse thoracic aortic aneurysm. UMIN-CTR (University hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry) https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/index.cgi Clinical registration number: UMIN000051531.

Keywords: Debranching-first technique; Frozen elephant trunk; Total arch replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Operative schema of total arch replacement using frozen elephant trunk and neck vessel debranching
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimated overall survival (%) (A). Estimated cumulative aortic-related mortality (%) (B)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Estimated overall cumulative incidence of reintervention (%) (A). Unplanned reintervention (%) (B)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Yoshitake A, Iida Y, Yamazaki M, Hayashi K, Inaba Y, Shimizu H. Midterm results of 2-stage hybrid arch repair for extensive aortic arch aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;56:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.07.063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Bartolomeo R, Murana G, Di Marco L, Pantaleo A, Alfonsi J, Leone A, et al. Frozen versus conventional elephant trunk technique: application in clinical practice. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(Suppl 1):i20–i28. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vernice NA, Wingo ME, Walker PB, Demetres M, Stalter LN, Yang Q, et al. The great vessel freeze-out: a meta-analysis of conventional versus frozen elephant trunks in aortic arch surgery. J Card Surg. 2022;37:2397–2407. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ius F, Hagl C, Haverich A, Pichlmaier M. Elephant trunk procedure 27 years after Borst: what remains and what is new? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marco LD, Mariani C, Murana G, Amodio C, Campanini F, Berardi M, et al. Why is frozen elephant trunk better than classical elephant trunk? Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;38:S70–S78. doi: 10.1007/s12055-021-01302-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources