Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer's Disease: Rationale and Implications
- PMID: 37807782
- PMCID: PMC10741308
- DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230467
Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer's Disease: Rationale and Implications
Abstract
The neurodegenerative disease field has enjoyed extremely limited success in the development of effective therapeutics. One potential reason is the lack of disease models that yield accurate predictions and optimal therapeutic targets. Standard clinical trials have pre-determined a single treatment modality, which may be unrelated to the primary drivers of neurodegeneration. Recent proof-of-concept clinical trials using a precision medicine approach suggest a new model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a chronic innate encephalitis that creates a network insufficiency. Identifying and addressing the multiple potential contributors to cognitive decline for each patient may represent a more effective strategy. Here we review the rationale for a precision medicine approach in prevention and treatment of cognitive decline associated with AD. Results and implications from recent proof-of-concept clinical trials are presented. Randomized controlled trials, with much larger patient numbers, are likely to be significant to establishing precision medicine protocols as a standard of care for prevention and treatment of cognitive decline. Furthermore, combining this approach with the pharmaceutical approach offers the potential for enhanced outcomes. However, incorporating precision medicine approaches into everyday evaluation and care, as well as future clinical trials, would require fundamental changes in trial design, IRB considerations, funding considerations, laboratory evaluation, personalized treatment plans, treatment teams, and ultimately in reimbursement guidelines. Nonetheless, precision medicine approaches to AD, based on a novel model of AD pathophysiology, offer promise that has not been realized to date with monotherapeutic approaches.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; MRI volumetrics; clinical trial; mild cognitive impairment; neurodegeneration; systems.
Conflict of interest statement
S. Hausman-Cohen is a founder of IntellxxDNA. D. Bredesen consults for Apollo Heath and Life Seasons, neither of which had any role in the trial described, in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing the report, or providing products for study participants or any funding for the study. Life Seasons produces a brain health product, which was not used in this study. None of the clinical trial data were shared with any corporation or for-profit entity prior to public availability. D. Bredesen is an Editorial Board Member of this journal but was not involved in the peer-review process nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.
References
-
- Mintun MA, Wessels AM, Sims JR (2021) Donanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. Reply. N Engl J Med 385, 667. - PubMed
-
- van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, Kanekiyo M, Li D, Reyderman L, Cohen S, Froelich L, Katayama S, Sabbagh M, Vellas B, Watson D, Dhadda S, Irizarry M, Kramer LD, Iwatsubo T (2023) Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 388, 9–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
