Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;17(2):211-219.
doi: 10.3233/PRM-220052.

Clinical feeding assessment: An effective screening test to predict aspiration in children in low resource settings

Affiliations

Clinical feeding assessment: An effective screening test to predict aspiration in children in low resource settings

Vijeyta Dahiya et al. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2024.

Abstract

Objective: Diagnosis and management of swallowing problems in children is crucial for improvement of their health status and quality of life. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of clinical feeding assessment (CFA) as a screening test to detect aspiration in children using fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) as the gold standard.

Methods: A prospective study of 80 children aged below 16 years who were referred to a paediatric otolaryngology clinic for swallowing complaints was completed from 2019 to 2020. Swallowing was assessed by both CFA and FEES. Presence of any one of the following symptoms was considered positive for aspiration in CFA: cough, wet vocal quality, and respiratory distress. Aspiration on FEES was measured using the Penetration Aspiration Scale. The clinical predictors of aspiration were analysed.

Results: The majority of the children (78.8%) had an associated neurological condition, with cerebral palsy being the most common. CFA had a sensitivity ranging from 80% to 100% and a specificity ranging from 68% to 79% for predicting true aspiration for different food consistencies. The significant risk factors predicting aspiration (p value <0.05) were history of prior intubation (p = 0.009), history of nasal regurgitation (p = 0.002) and spasticity on examination (p = 0.043).

Conclusion: This study showed that CFA can be used as a screening test in evaluation of paediatric dysphagia. In those with negative CFA, the chances of aspiration are less while those with positive CFA need further evaluation. In addition, the availability and cost-effectiveness of the test make it a good tool for screening aspiration in low-resource settings.

Keywords: Swallowing disorders; aspiration; clinical feeding assessment; fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; pediatric; penetration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Similar articles

References

    1. Burklow KA, McGrath AM, Kaul A. Management and prevention of feeding problems in young children with prematurity and very low birth weight. Infants Young Child. 2002;14(4):19–30. doi: 10.1155/2012/896257. - DOI
    1. Bhattacharyya N The prevalence of pediatric voice and swallowing problems in the United States: Pediatric Voice and Swallowing. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(3):746–50. doi: 10.1002/lary.24931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lefton-Greif MA, Arvedson JC. Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders: State of health, population trends, and application of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28(3):161–5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984722. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rommel N, De Meyer A-M, Feenstra L, Veereman-Wauters G The complexity of feeding problems in 700 infants and young children presenting to a tertiary care institution. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;37(1):75–84. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200307000-00014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swan K, Cordier R, Brown T, Speyer R. Psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of videofluoroscopic and fibre-endoscopic evaluations of swallowing: A systematic review. Dysphagia. 2019;34(1):2–33. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources