doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.001.
eCollection 2023 Sep.
Reply: Do not hesitate to implant a mechanical valve in tricuspid valve position for fear of later stroke and valve thrombosis in young-aged patients
Affiliations
- PMID: 37808013
- PMCID: PMC10556802
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.001
Item in Clipboard
Reply: Do not hesitate to implant a mechanical valve in tricuspid valve position for fear of later stroke and valve thrombosis in young-aged patients
JTCVS Open.
.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):739-746. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09553-7. Epub 2016 Sep 16. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017. PMID: 27636399
-
Thrombolytic Therapy for Right-Sided Mechanical Pulmonic and Tricuspid Valves: The Largest Survival Analysis to Date.Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Dec 1;42(6):543-7. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4659. eCollection 2015 Dec. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015. PMID: 26664307 Free PMC article.
-
Management of recurrent mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis in the perioperative period of noncardiac surgery: a case report.J Med Case Rep. 2012 Jun 12;6:150. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-150. J Med Case Rep. 2012. PMID: 22691721 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Mar;30(3):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 1. Heart Lung Circ. 2021. PMID: 33229238
-
Successful management of multiple permanent pacemaker complications--infection, 13 year old silent lead perforation and exteriorisation following failed percutaneous extraction, superior vena cava obstruction, tricuspid valve endocarditis, pulmonary embolism and prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Feb 24;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-4-12. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19239701 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sohn S.H., Kang Y., Kim J.S., Hwang H.Y., Kim K.H., Choi J.W. Early- and long-term outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement: a nationwide population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.025. [Epub ahead of print] - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hwang H.Y., Kim K.H., Kim K.B., Ahn H. Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is not superior in patients younger than 65 years who need long-term anticoagulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1154–1161. - PubMed
-
- Kang Y., Hwang H.Y., Sohn S.H., Choi J.W., Kim K.H., Kim K.B. Fifteen-year outcomes after bioprosthetic and mechanical tricuspid valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:1564–1571. - PubMed
-
- Kang Y., Hwang H.Y., Sohn S.H., Choi J.W., Kim K.H., Kim K.B. Comparative analysis of structural valve deterioration after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement: bovine pericardial versus porcine valves. Artif Organs. 2021;45:911–918. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
