From egg to slaughter: monitoring the welfare of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, throughout their entire life cycle in aquaculture
- PMID: 37808101
- PMCID: PMC10551173
- DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1268396
From egg to slaughter: monitoring the welfare of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, throughout their entire life cycle in aquaculture
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) throughout their entire life cycle within aquaculture, spanning from reproduction to slaughter. The methodology was structured to identify welfare indicators closely aligned with the principles of animal freedoms defined by the Farm Animal Council, encompassing environmental, health, nutritional, behavioral, and psychological freedom. Notably, psychological freedom was inherently considered within the behavioral and physical analyses of the animals. To accomplish this, an integrative systematic literature review was conducted to define precise indicators and their corresponding reference values for each stage of tilapia cultivation. These reference values were subsequently categorized using a scoring system that assessed the deviation of each indicator from established ideal (score 1), tolerable (score 2), and critical (score 3) ranges for the welfare of the target species. Subsequently, a laboratory experiment was executed to validate the pre-selected health indicators, specifically tailored for the early life stages of tilapia. This test facilitated an assessment of the applicability of these indicators under operational conditions. Building on the insights gained from this experimentation, partial welfare indices (PWIs) were computed for each assessed freedom, culminating in the derivation of a general welfare index (GWI). Mathematical equations were employed to calculate these indices, offering a quantitative and standardized measure of welfare. This approach equips tilapia farmers and processors with the tools necessary for the continuous monitoring and enhancement of their production systems and stimulate the adoption of more sustainable and ethical practices within the tilapia farming.
Keywords: fish welfare; grow-out; larviculture; protocols; sustainable aquaculture; welfare indices.
Copyright © 2023 Pedrazzani, Cozer, Quintiliano, Tavares, Biernaski and Ostrensky.
Conflict of interest statement
AP was employed by Wai Ora Aquaculture and Environmental Technology Ltd. MQ was employed by FAI Farms from Brazil. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Ultrasonography for non-invasive sex identification and reproductive assessment in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).Front Vet Sci. 2024 Oct 9;11:1467158. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1467158. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 39444737 Free PMC article.
-
The welfare of farmed Nile tilapia: a review.Front Vet Sci. 2025 May 6;12:1567984. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1567984. eCollection 2025. Front Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40395805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Welfare in Nile Tilapia Production: Dorsal Fin Erection as a Visual Indicator for Insensibility.Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;11(10):3007. doi: 10.3390/ani11103007. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34680026 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Welfare in the Semi-Intensive and Intensive Culture Systems in Thailand.Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;13(15):2498. doi: 10.3390/ani13152498. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37570306 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of introduced Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on non-native aquatic ecosystems.Pak J Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 1;16(3):121-6. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.121.126. Pak J Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 24171273 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasonography for non-invasive sex identification and reproductive assessment in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).Front Vet Sci. 2024 Oct 9;11:1467158. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1467158. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 39444737 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sneddon LY, Lopez-Luna J, Wolfenden DCC, Leach MC, Valentim AM, Steenbergen PJ, et al. Fish sentience denial: muddying the waters. Anim Sentience. (2018) 115:1–12. 10.51291/2377-7478.1317 - DOI
-
- Chandroo KP, Duncan IJH. Moccia RD. Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2004) 86:225–50. 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.004 - DOI
-
- Ashley PJ. Fish welfare: Current issues in aquaculture. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2007) 104:199–235. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.001 - DOI
-
- Braithwaite V. Do Fish Feel Pain? Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2010) 208 p.
-
- UK Public General Acts. Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022 Chapter 22. (2022). Available online at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/22/contents (accessed June 10, 2023).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources