Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986 Sep;69(3):160-8.

Choice of nebulisers and compressors for delivery of carbenicillin aerosol

  • PMID: 3780896
Comparative Study

Choice of nebulisers and compressors for delivery of carbenicillin aerosol

S P Newman et al. Eur J Respir Dis. 1986 Sep.

Abstract

Although aerosol antibiotics have been used successfully to treat respiratory tract infection in patients with cystic fibrosis, little information exists concerning the correct nebulisation technique for antibiotic solutions. We have measured aerosol output, droplet size and nebulisation time for 1 g carbenicillin (Pyopen, Beechams) diluted with 3 ml or 4 ml water for injection and delivered from six brands of jet nebuliser (Cirrus, DeVilbiss, Inspiron, Turret, Unicorn and Upmist). Three relatively weak compressors (Medix Traveller, Medic-Aid PortaNeb 50 and Inspiron) and three more powerful compressors (Medix WOBL, Medix Maxi mark I and Gast) were used as driving sources. Maxi and Gast compressors increased the quantity of "respirable" (less than 5 micron diameter) carbenicillin aerosol, and reduced nebulisation times; with the weaker compressors, nebulisation times (up to 50 min) were unacceptably long. The Turret nebuliser proved to be the most efficient, but several other brands would also be acceptable if used with a powerful compressor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types