Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 22:14:1072800.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1072800. eCollection 2023.

What does it mean to follow? A critique of the followership literature and a conceptual model of the emergence of downward following

Nicolas Bastardoz  1 , Sofie Adriaensen  1
Affiliations
Review

What does it mean to follow? A critique of the followership literature and a conceptual model of the emergence of downward following

Nicolas Bastardoz et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

What does it mean to follow? In this paper, we systematically review the followership literature for the period 2017-2021. Our review shows that the followership literature suffers from three major issues that limit its validity. The followership field is dominated by a role-based approach equating direct reports with followers; empirical studies fail to study actual following behaviors, and there are no studies of downward following, which we define as any behavior or effort aimed at achieving a shared goal, carried out by an individual in a position of formal power who is influenced by one or more individuals in a position of inferior authority. Our manuscript builds on the process approach to study what it means to follow. We argue that the followership field needs to study actual followership behaviors at the micro "interaction episodes" and rely on quantitative behavioral coding. We then propose a conceptual, multi-level model that details antecedents and boundary conditions of the emergence of downward following. We conclude by discussing the organizational implications of our approach and model.

Keywords: downward following; follower; process approach; shared goals; social influence process; upward leading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multilevel conceptual model of the emergence of downward following (and upward leading).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Acton B. P., Foti R. J., Lord R. G., Gladfelter J. A. (2019). Putting emergence Back in leadership emergence: a dynamic, multilevel, process-oriented framework. Leadersh. Q. 30, 145–164. doi: 10.1016/J.Leaqua.2018.07.002 - DOI
    1. Ahmad M. G., Loch C. (2020). What do the followers want? The Core functions of leadership. Leadersh. Q. 31:101293. doi: 10.1016/J.Leaqua.2019.04.003 - DOI
    1. Aime F., Humphrey S., Derue D. S., Paul J. B. (2014). The riddle of Heterarchy: power transitions in cross-functional teams. Acad. Manag. J. 57, 327–352. doi: 10.5465/Amj.2011.0756 - DOI
    1. Alvesson M., Sveningsson S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: the extra-Ordinarization of the mundane. Hum. Relat. 56, 1435–1459. doi: 10.1177/00187267035612001 - DOI
    1. Antonakis J., Bastardoz N., Jacquart P., Shamir B. (2016). Charisma: an ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3, 293–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062305 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources