Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 7;9(9):e19947.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature

Affiliations
Review

Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature

Prativa Poudel et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pits and tanks) is based on non-empirical evidence. This systematic review presents an overview and limitations of field-based methods used for the quantification of GHG emissions from OSS. Papers published in English were searched in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Directory of Articles and Journals. Peer-reviewed papers that reported field-based methods applied to containment units in OSS were included in this study. Only eight out of 2085 papers met the inclusion criteria with septic tanks as the sole technology reported and were thus, considered for the review. Most of the studies have been conducted in middle- and high-income countries. Field-based measurements of GHGs are conducted using a flux chamber (FC) and the most commonly used FC methods are (a) the modified simple static FC, (b) automated static FC, and (c) floating FC. Data reported in published studies do not provide sufficient information on the calibration and validation of the results from the FCs used. The complex FC designs, laborious fieldwork operations, and reliance on expensive, specialist equipment, suggest that such methods may not be suitable in Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs), where resources and access to laboratory facilities are limited. Also, the complexity of pits and tank typology in LMICs (i.e., unstandardised designs and sizes) may be a challenge to the use of FCs with fixed dimensions and set operational conditions. The variation in the quantification methods and resulting emission rates among the studies indicates that gaps prevail in the use of existing methods. Therefore, there is still a need for a simple field-based, easily adaptable FC method with adequate calibration and validation that can help in reliably quantifying the emissions from different OSS in any LMICs.

Keywords: Greenhouse gas emissions; Onsite sanitation; Pit latrines; Septic tanks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Different components of the septic system.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow diagram for the search of studies on field-based GHG quantification methods.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Niwagaba C.B., Mbeguere M., Strande L. 2014. Faecal Sludge Quantification, Characterisation and Treatment Objectives.
    1. Who A. © WHO; 1992. Guide to the Development of On-Site Sanitation; p. 1992.
    1. Strande L., Ronteltap M., Brdjanovic D. 2014. Faecal Sludge Management Lecture.
    1. Jmp . 2021. Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000-2020: Five Years into the SDGs.
    1. Banerjee G. Underground pollution travel from leach pits of on-site sanitation facilities: a case study. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2011;13(3):489–497. doi: 10.1007/s10098-010-0331-3. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources