Development of the Workplace Interpersonal Problems Scale for Care Workers (WIPS) and examination of its reliability and validity
- PMID: 37809750
- PMCID: PMC10559914
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20156
Development of the Workplace Interpersonal Problems Scale for Care Workers (WIPS) and examination of its reliability and validity
Abstract
Introduction: The turnover rate of care workers has remained high by global standards, with previous studies showing an association between workplace interpersonal relations and care worker turnover and turnover intentions. This study details the development of the Workplace Interpersonal Problems Scale for Care Workers (WIPS) and examines its reliability and validity according to the COSMIN guidelines.
Methods: A total of 476 care workers employed by elder care facilities participated in the study. This study examined the reliability and validity of the WIPS after its development. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α, test reliability with the standard error of measurement, and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Content validity, construct validity, and structural validity were examined to evaluate validity.
Results: Both total and subscale scores of the WIPS had a Cronbach's α coefficient >0.75 and high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.75). Content validity analysis showed the item-content validity index of ≥0.90 for all WIPS items, confirming 100% of the hypotheses for testing construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit for the hypothesized six-factor construct (CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.05).
Conclusions: The WIPS was found to be a valid and reliable instrument. With the growth of the elderly population worldwide, we believe that the WIPS will be a useful quantitative measure to assess workplace interpersonal problems affecting care workers in various aspects.
Keywords: Construct validity; Content validity; Structural validity; Test–retest reliability; Workplace Interpersonal Problems Scale for Care Workers.
© 2023 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Workplace interpersonal relationships and turnover intentions among care workers working in older adult care facilities in Japan: a mediation analysis comparing direct and mediated effects via psychological distress.BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02520-9. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39696203 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing workplace civility: Validity and 1-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese version of the CREW Civility Scale.J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12332. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12332. J Occup Health. 2022. PMID: 35434891 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of the ten-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC10) instrument in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore.Rheumatol Int. 2019 Jan;39(1):105-110. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4217-8. Epub 2018 Dec 6. Rheumatol Int. 2019. PMID: 30523476
-
Developing and Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Brief Adolescent Respiratory System Health Assessment Scale-Student Version in a Chinese Sample.Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 17;9:713066. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.713066. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34485202 Free PMC article.
-
[The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the 5C Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination Scale].J Korean Acad Nurs. 2023 Jun;53(3):324-339. doi: 10.4040/jkan.23021. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2023. PMID: 37435763 Korean.
Cited by
-
Workplace interpersonal relationships and turnover intentions among care workers working in older adult care facilities in Japan: a mediation analysis comparing direct and mediated effects via psychological distress.BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02520-9. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39696203 Free PMC article.
References
-
- United Nations World population prospects 2022: summary of results. 2022. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa...
-
- OECD . OECD Publishing; Paris: 2020. Who Cares? Attracting and Retaining Care Workers for the Elderly. OECED Health Policy Studies.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous