Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 9;31(12):619.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08076-9.

A systematic review of qualitative research exploring patient and health professional perspectives of breakthrough cancer pain

G B Crawford #  1   2 , A Lakhani #  3   4   5 , L Palmer  6   7 , M Sebalj  3 , P Rolan  6   8
Affiliations

A systematic review of qualitative research exploring patient and health professional perspectives of breakthrough cancer pain

G B Crawford et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: Breakthrough cancer pain (BtCP) is a prevalent health issue which is difficult to manage. A plethora of quantitative research in this area exists. There is a paucity of research on the perspectives of health professionals and patients surrounding domains impacting effective treatment, including definitions of BtCP, treatment, and education opportunities. This review aims to identify and synthesize the extent of qualitative research exploring health professional and patient perspectives of BtCP.

Methods: A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was undertaken. The approach was registered with Prospero. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed literature published any date prior to May 19, 2022. Eligible sources must have considered health professional and/or patient perspectives of BtCP. A narrative synthesis approach was utilized.

Results: Three sources met the review criteria. One source explored nurse perspectives, while two sources explored patient perspectives. Study quality was moderate to high. Overlapping themes across the three studies included communication, defining BtCP, impact of BtCP, management of BtCP, perceptions of BtCP, analgesia and pain relief, and training and professional development.

Conclusion: Given limited research investigating clinician and patient perspectives of BtCP, a rich understanding informed by exploratory qualitative methods around identification, best management strategies, professional development, and factors promoting and inhibiting best practice remains unclear. Further qualitative inquiry is warranted, and it is expected such research will inform BtCP clinical guidelines.

Keywords: Breakthrough cancer pain; Health professional; Palliative care; Patients; Qualitative; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Article selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brant JM, et al. Breakthrough cancer pain: a systematic review of pharmacologic management. CJON. 2017;21(3):71–80. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.S3.71-80. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mercadante S, Portenoy RK. Breakthrough cancer pain: twenty-five years of study. Pain. 2016;157(12):2657–2663. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000721. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies AN. Cancer-related breakthrough pain. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2006;67(8):414–416. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2006.67.8.21960. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fortner BV, Okon TA, Portenoy RK. A survey of pain-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and physician office visits reported by cancer patients with and without history of breakthrough pain. J Pain. 2002;3(1):38–44. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.27136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simmonds MA. Management of breakthrough pain due to cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 1999;13(8):1103–8. - PubMed

Publication types