Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986;3(5):335-42.
doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370030506.

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate: reanalysis of a three-generation family study from England

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate: reanalysis of a three-generation family study from England

M L Marazita et al. Genet Epidemiol. 1986.

Abstract

The study population consists of 424 three-generation families originally ascertained through nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) surgical probands by Carter et al [J Med Genet 19:246-261, 1982] in London, England. Carter et al proposed that the multifactorial threshold model (MF/T) could explain the data. The goal of our study was to test that hypothesis, plus alternatives, rigorously. Two approaches were used: 1) Carter et al had proposed that these data were consistent with the predictions of the MF/T as presented by Carter [Br Med Bull 25:52-57, 1969]. However, we tested those predictions using standard chi 2 tests and found statistically significant departures from the predictions in these families. 2) Complex segregation analysis under the mixed model was performed. Again, the MF/T model could be rejected, as could a model of a major locus alone. The best-fitting model included both major locus and multifactorial components. When the data were analyzed in two parts based on the proband's phenotype (CL vs CL + P) there was some evidence of heterogeneity in that there was a significant proportion of sporadic cases in the families of CL probands but not in the families of CL + P probands. Our results provide no support for the MF/T model. The results from segregation analyses of CL +/- P in these families were most consistent with autosomal major gene inheritance plus multifactorial contributions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources