Improving HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence and retention in care: Process evaluation and recommendation development from a nationally implemented PrEP programme
- PMID: 37812636
- PMCID: PMC10561843
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292289
Improving HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence and retention in care: Process evaluation and recommendation development from a nationally implemented PrEP programme
Abstract
Introduction: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), in which people take HIV medication to prevent HIV acquisition, underpins global HIV transmission elimination strategies. Effective prevention needs people to adhere to PrEP and remain in care during periods of risk, but this is difficult to achieve. We undertook a process evaluation of Scotland's PrEP programme to explore barriers and facilitators to PrEP adherence and retention in care and to systematically develop evidence-based, theoretically-informed recommendations to address them.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups (09/2018-07/2019) with patients who identified as gay or bisexual men and were either using PrEP, had declined the offer of PrEP, had stopped PrEP, or had been assessed as ineligible for PrEP (n = 39 of whom n = 5 (13%) identified as trans, median age 31 years and interquartile range 14 years), healthcare professionals involved in PrEP provision (n = 54 including specialist sexual health doctors and nurses of various grades, PrEP prescribing general practitioners, health promotion officers, midwifes, and a PrEP clinical secretary), and clients (n = 9) and staff (n = 15) of non-governmental organisations with an HIV prevention remit across Scotland. We used thematic analysis to map key barriers and facilitators to priority areas that could enhance adherence and retention in care. We used implementation science analytic tools (Theoretical Domains Framework, Intervention Functions, Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy, APEASE criteria) and expert opinion to systematically generate recommendations.
Results: Barriers included perceived complexity of on-demand dosing, tendency for users to stop PrEP before seeking professional support, troublesome side-effects, limited flexibility in the settings/timings/nature of review appointments, PrEP-related stigma and emerging stigmas around not using PrEP. Facilitators included flexible appointment scheduling, reminders, and processes to follow up non-attenders. Examples of the 25 recommendations include: emphasising benefits of PrEP reviews and providing appointments flexibly within individualised PrEP care; using clinic systems to remind/recall PrEP users; supporting PrEP conversations among sexual partners; clear on-demand dosing guidance; encouraging good PrEP citizenship; detailed discussion on managing side-effects and care/coping planning activities.
Conclusions: PrEP adherence and retention in care is challenging, reducing the effectiveness of PrEP at individual and population levels. We identify and provide solutions to where and how collaborative interventions across public health, clinical, and community practice could address these challenges.
Copyright: © 2023 MacDonald et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: CSE reports research grants from National Institute of Health Research UK, Chief Scientist Office of Scotland, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK Clinical Research Collaboration, Health Protection Scotland, and European Centres for Disease Control. PF reports research grants from National Institute of Health Research UK, Australian Research Council, and Chief Scientist Office of Scotland. RN reports research grants from National Institute of Health Research UK and Chief Scientist Office of Scotland and non-executive director membership of the Board of Public Health Scotland from April 2020. DC has provided expert advice on projects unrelated to prescribing to Gilead, manufacturer of Truvada and Descovy HIV PrEP. Payment was made to the charity British HIV Association (BHIVA) and no direct payment or benefit was received. LM reports research grants from National Institute of Health Research UK, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and Chief Scientist Office of Scotland.
Figures
References
-
- Murchu EO, Marshall L, Teljeur C, Harrington P, Hayes C, Moran P, et al. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e048478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048478 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Scottish Government. Ending HIV transmission in Scotland by 2030. [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2023 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/ending-hiv-transmission-scotland-2030/
-
- Department of Health and Social Care. HIV drug PrEP to be available across England [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2023 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hiv-drug-prep-to-be-available-across-...
-
- World Health Organisation. Global data shows increasing PrEP use and widespread adoption of WHO PrEP recommendations [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2023 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/global-data-shows-i...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous