Autonomy, the moral circle, and the limits of ownership
- PMID: 37813432
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X23001243
Autonomy, the moral circle, and the limits of ownership
Abstract
Why can't we own people? Boyer proposes that the key consideration concerns inclusion in the moral circle. I propose an alternative, which is that specific mental capacities, especially the capacity for autonomy, play a key role in determining judgments about human and animal ownership. Autonomous beings are viewed as owning themselves, which precludes them from being owned by others.
Comment in
-
Ownership psychology, its antecedents and consequences.Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 10;46:e355. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23002406. Behav Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37813457
Comment on
-
Ownership psychology as a cognitive adaptation: A minimalist model.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Oct 18;46:e323. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002527. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36254791
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources