Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 9;27(1):390.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04641-0.

Improvement of composite kidney outcomes by AKI care bundles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Improvement of composite kidney outcomes by AKI care bundles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chun Yin See et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: Various approaches have been suggested to identify acute kidney injury (AKI) early and to initiate kidney-protective measures in patients at risk or with AKI. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether care bundles improve kidney outcomes in these patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of AKI care bundles with or without urinary biomarkers in the recognition and management of AKI. The main outcomes were major adverse kidney events (MAKEs) consisting of moderate-severe AKI, receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality.

Results: Out of 7434 abstracts screened, 946 published studies were identified. Thirteen studies [five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight non-RCTs] including 16,540 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed a lower incidence of MAKE in the AKI care bundle group [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.81] with differences in all 3 individual outcomes [moderate-severe AKI (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82), RRT (OR 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46-0.88) and mortality]. Subgroup analysis of the RCTs, all adopted biomarker-based approach, decreased the risk of MAKE (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74). Network meta-analysis could reveal that the incorporation of biomarkers in care bundles carried a significantly lower risk of MAKE when compared to care bundles without biomarkers (OR = 0.693, 95% CI = 0.50-0.96), while the usual care subgroup had a significantly higher risk (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09-1.52).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that care bundles decreased the risk of MAKE, moderate-severe AKI and need for RRT in AKI patients. Moreover, the inclusion of biomarkers in care bundles had a greater impact than care bundles without biomarkers.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Biomarkers; Care bundles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection. PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot stratified the risk of a major adverse kidney events (MAKE), b acute kidney injury (AKI), c renal replacement therapy (RRT), and d all-cause mortality associated with care bundle versus usual care. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. a Forest plot of MAKE from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers. b Forest plot of AKI from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers. c Forest plot of RRT from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers. d Forest plot of all-cause mortality from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot stratified the risk of a major adverse kidney events (MAKE), b acute kidney injury (AKI), c renal replacement therapy (RRT), and d all-cause mortality associated with care bundle versus usual care. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. a Forest plot of MAKE from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers. b Forest plot of AKI from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers. c Forest plot of RRT from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers. d Forest plot of all-cause mortality from care bundle versus usual care separated based on whether they included biomarkers
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot stratified the risk of a major adverse kidney events (MAKEs), b acute kidney injury (AKI), c renal replacement therapy (RRT), and d all-cause mortality associated with care bundle versus usual care. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. a Forest plot of MAKEs from care bundle versus usual care with all RCTs. b Forest plot of AKI from care bundle versus usual care with all RCTs. c Forest plot of RRT from care bundle versus usual care with all RCTs. d Forest plot of all-cause mortality from care bundle versus usual care with all RCTs

References

    1. Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Cely CM, Colman R, Cruz DN, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(8):1411–1423. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3934-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005;294(7):813–818. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.7.813. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zarbock A, Nadim MK, Pickkers P, Gomez HA-O, Bell S, Joannidis MA-O, et al. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup. (1759–507X (Electronic)). - PubMed
    1. Weiss R, Saadat-Gilani K, Kerschke L, Wempe C, Meersch M, Zarbock A. EPIdemiology of surgery-associated acute kidney Injury (EPIS-AKI): study protocol for a multicentre, observational trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e055705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quan S, Pannu N, Wilson T, Ball C, Tan Z, Tonelli M, et al. Prognostic implications of adding urine output to serum creatinine measurements for staging of acute kidney injury after major surgery: a cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(12):2049–2056. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw374. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources